Cristina Rodríguez (New York University Law)
Ruth Mason (Connecticut Law), Tax Expenditures and Global Labor Mobility
West Coast Law and Literature Conference. Topic: “Making Money/Faking Money: Counterfeit, Credit, and the Alchemy of Culture”
| July 1, 2009 | ||
| November 20, 2009 | to | November 21, 2009 |
The Terrence J. Murphy Institute for Catholic Thought, Law, and Public Policy at the University of St. Thomas will sponsor a conference titled “Christian Realism and Public Life: Catholic and Protestant Perspectives,” on November 20-21, 2009, at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis.
An examination of “realism” in religious and political thought is timely indeed. The term has been at the forefront of recent American foreign-policy debates over the role of moral values and the use of force. Pope Benedict XVI has spoken in several contexts of a “Christian realism” that offers a more sober and solid hope for social life than do alternative views. And President Obama has identified the Christian Realism of Reinhold Niebuhr as among his chief philosophical influences. Niebuhr’s approach was in several ways distinctively Protestant. But it is evident that the impulse for Christian public theology to be realistic—to be based in a clear-headed assessment of facts about God, human beings, and the world—cuts across Catholic and Protestant thinkers, although the themes and the definitions of realism vary.
The goal of the conference is to explore the role and meaning of “realism” in a Christian ethic of public life, with attention to topics and areas of law or public policy that are of interest to both Catholics and Protestants, and to ethicists, theologians, legal scholars, and political scientists among others. Committed plenary speakers include Jean Bethke Elshtain ( Chicago), Robin Lovin (Southern Methodist), John Carlson (Arizona State), and William Cavanaugh (St. Thomas), with other plenary invitations in process.
This call for papers is for concurrent sessions. Examples of relevant topics include:
- Theological assessments of human nature and its relevance to public policy
- Categorical approaches to moral reasoning vs. pragmatic approaches
- Loci of hope: for example, the extent to which it rests in the church or the world
- Assessments of Niebuhr or other thinkers who have emphasized realism
- The foundations or details of just-war thought
- Realism in Christian approaches to economic matters
- The place of Christianity in American public life
Abstracts of proposed papers should be one page and should include the author’s name, affiliation, mailing address, and e-mail address. The deadline for submission of proposals is Monday, June 15, 2009. Notification of acceptance will be mailed by July 1, 2009. Abstracts should be sent by e-mail to murphyinstit[at]stthomas.edu or by first-class mail to
Terrence J. Murphy Institute
for Catholic Thought, Law, and Public Policy
Re: Christian Realism Conference
University of St. Thomas
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403-2015
The Terrence J. Murphy Institute for Catholic Thought, Law, and Public Policy at the University of St. Thomas will sponsor a conference titled “Christian Realism and Public Life: Catholic and Protestant Perspectives,” on November 20-21, 2009, at the University of St. Thomas School of Law in Minneapolis.
An examination of “realism” in religious and political thought is timely indeed. The term has been at the forefront of recent American foreign-policy debates over the role of moral values and the use of force. Pope Benedict XVI has spoken in several contexts of a “Christian realism” that offers a more sober and solid hope for social life than do alternative views. And President Obama has identified the Christian Realism of Reinhold Niebuhr as among his chief philosophical influences. Niebuhr’s approach was in several ways distinctively Protestant. But it is evident that the impulse for Christian public theology to be realistic—to be based in a clear-headed assessment of facts about God, human beings, and the world—cuts across Catholic and Protestant thinkers, although the themes and the definitions of realism vary.
The goal of the conference is to explore the role and meaning of “realism” in a Christian ethic of public life, with attention to topics and areas of law or public policy that are of interest to both Catholics and Protestants, and to ethicists, theologians, legal scholars, and political scientists among others. Committed plenary speakers include Jean Bethke Elshtain ( Chicago), Robin Lovin (Southern Methodist), John Carlson (Arizona State), and William Cavanaugh (St. Thomas), with other plenary invitations in process.
This call for papers is for concurrent sessions. Examples of relevant topics include:
- Theological assessments of human nature and its relevance to public policy
- Categorical approaches to moral reasoning vs. pragmatic approaches
- Loci of hope: for example, the extent to which it rests in the church or the world
- Assessments of Niebuhr or other thinkers who have emphasized realism
- The foundations or details of just-war thought
- Realism in Christian approaches to economic matters
- The place of Christianity in American public life
Abstracts of proposed papers should be one page and should include the author’s name, affiliation, mailing address, and e-mail address. The deadline for submission of proposals is Monday, June 15, 2009. Notification of acceptance will be mailed by July 1, 2009. Abstracts should be sent by e-mail to murphyinstit[at]stthomas.edu or by first-class mail to
Terrence J. Murphy Institute
for Catholic Thought, Law, and Public Policy
Re: Christian Realism Conference
University of St. Thomas
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403-2015
| May 15, 2009 | ||
| October 30, 2009 |
The Seton Hall Law Review will be hosting a Symposium on October 30, 2009, at Seton Hall Law School in Newark, NJ, to address the role of securities regulation in the current global financial crisis. Specifically, this event will examine the origins and genesis of the crisis, address the future of securities regulation domestically and internationally, and attempt to anticipate the role of government agencies, self-regulatory organizations, and private market participants in shaping and effectuating regulation.
This Symposium will bring together experts from both public and private sectors, as well as from the legal and academic communities, to explain, debate, and assess the challenges and opportunities presented by the current and prospective landscape of global securities regulation.
Persons interested in participating as a speaker and/or in publishing a piece in the special Symposium issue of the Seton Hall Law Review should submit a CV and a 200-word abstract of their presentation to Laura Fant, Symposium Editor, by May 15, 2009. Laura Fant may be reached at (617) 480-7428 / Laura.Fant@student.shu.edu. Prospective speakers or panelists should indicate whether they would be interested in submitting a paper based on their presentation for publication. Contributions are welcome from scholars and practitioners in all disciplines.
The Seton Hall Law Review will be hosting a Symposium on October 30, 2009, at Seton Hall Law School in Newark, NJ, to address the role of securities regulation in the current global financial crisis. Specifically, this event will examine the origins and genesis of the crisis, address the future of securities regulation domestically and internationally, and attempt to anticipate the role of government agencies, self-regulatory organizations, and private market participants in shaping and effectuating regulation.
This Symposium will bring together experts from both public and private sectors, as well as from the legal and academic communities, to explain, debate, and assess the challenges and opportunities presented by the current and prospective landscape of global securities regulation.
Persons interested in participating as a speaker and/or in publishing a piece in the special Symposium issue of the Seton Hall Law Review should submit a CV and a 200-word abstract of their presentation to Laura Fant, Symposium Editor, by May 15, 2009. Laura Fant may be reached at (617) 480-7428 / Laura.Fant@student.shu.edu. Prospective speakers or panelists should indicate whether they would be interested in submitting a paper based on their presentation for publication. Contributions are welcome from scholars and practitioners in all disciplines.
Kinch Hoekstra (Berkeley Law), The History of Mixed Government and the Future of Absolutism
Merritt B. Fox (Columbia Law), Fraud-on-the-Market Actions Against Foreign Issuers
| May 28, 2009 | to | May 29, 2009 |
The University of Washington School of Law presents Three Degrees: The Law of Climate Change and Human Rights Conference May 28-29, 2009. The Climate Project is a partner.
The Law of Climate Change and Human Rights Conference will bring legal practitioners and scholars from a range of disciplines together with an international body of relief organizations and peoples impacted most heavily by climate change, to discuss the application of human rights law to the impending climate crisis. Numerous scholars have suggested that human rights law may provide the most adequate and responsible remedy for climate-related impacts, and this conference will create an international forum to thoroughly test the available remedies, raise the legal issues associated with these remedies, and collaborate over necessary advancements in the law.Through the lens of a fictitious disaster scenario, The Law of Climate Change and Human Rights Conference will offer an opportunity for creative problem-solving and collaboration for lawyers engaged in the historically separate fields of environmental, human rights, refugee, and public health law, and scholars from fields as diverse as philosophy and geography. Panels will address topics such as the forced migration of climate refugees, the disproportionate impacts of climate change on the world’s poor, the national security implications of climate change, as well as reforms to the governance structure overseeing climate mitigation.
The University of Washington School of Law presents Three Degrees: The Law of Climate Change and Human Rights Conference May 28-29, 2009. The Climate Project is a partner.
The Law of Climate Change and Human Rights Conference will bring legal practitioners and scholars from a range of disciplines together with an international body of relief organizations and peoples impacted most heavily by climate change, to discuss the application of human rights law to the impending climate crisis. Numerous scholars have suggested that human rights law may provide the most adequate and responsible remedy for climate-related impacts, and this conference will create an international forum to thoroughly test the available remedies, raise the legal issues associated with these remedies, and collaborate over necessary advancements in the law.Through the lens of a fictitious disaster scenario, The Law of Climate Change and Human Rights Conference will offer an opportunity for creative problem-solving and collaboration for lawyers engaged in the historically separate fields of environmental, human rights, refugee, and public health law, and scholars from fields as diverse as philosophy and geography. Panels will address topics such as the forced migration of climate refugees, the disproportionate impacts of climate change on the world’s poor, the national security implications of climate change, as well as reforms to the governance structure overseeing climate mitigation.
| November 3, 2009 | to | November 5, 2009 |
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) will hold the Third International Conference on International Law and Trade in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The conference is an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants to come together, exchange ideas, and discuss emerging issues in IT law and the emerging technological environment.
For full details, please see the conference website.
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) will hold the Third International Conference on International Law and Trade in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The conference is an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants to come together, exchange ideas, and discuss emerging issues in IT law and the emerging technological environment.
For full details, please see the conference website.
| September 20, 2009 | ||
| October 15, 2009 |
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) invites submission of the papers for presentation at the Third International Conference on International Law and Trade, to be held in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The Conference provides an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants from different backgrounds to dialogue on important issues relating to international law, trade, commerce, and information technology.
The conference committee is seeking submission of papers for oral presentations; both academic, peer reviewed papers and presentations based on case studies, research in progress, or industry practices will be accepted. Full research papers must be submitted by September 20, 2009. Short presentations may be submitted by October 15.
For complete submission guidelines, suggested topics, and forms, please visit the call for papers page on the conference website.
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) invites submission of the papers for presentation at the Third International Conference on International Law and Trade, to be held in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The Conference provides an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants from different backgrounds to dialogue on important issues relating to international law, trade, commerce, and information technology.
The conference committee is seeking submission of papers for oral presentations; both academic, peer reviewed papers and presentations based on case studies, research in progress, or industry practices will be accepted. Full research papers must be submitted by September 20, 2009. Short presentations may be submitted by October 15.
For complete submission guidelines, suggested topics, and forms, please visit the call for papers page on the conference website.
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) will hold the 4th International Conference on legal, security and privacy issues in information technology law in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The Conference is an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants to come together, exchange ideas, and discuss emerging issues in IT law and the emerging technological environment.
For full details, please see the conference website.
| November 3, 2009 | to | November 5, 2009 |
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) will hold the 4th International Conference on legal, security and privacy issues in information technology law held in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The Conference is an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants to come together, exchange ideas, and discuss emerging issues in IT law and the emerging technological environment.
For full details, please see the conference website.
| September 20, 2009 | ||
| October 15, 2009 |
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) invites submission of the papers for presentation at the 4th International Conference on legal, security and privacy issues in information technology law, to be held in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The Conference is an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants to come together, exchange ideas, and discuss emerging issues in IT law and the emerging technological environment.
The conference committee is seeking submission of papers for oral presentations; both academic, peer reviewed papers and presentations based on short abstract and non-academic papers. Full research papers must be submitted by September 20, 2009. Abstract presentations may be submitted by October 15.
For complete submission guidelines, suggested topics, and forms, please visit the call for papers page on the conference website.
The International Association of IT Lawyers (IAITL) invites submission of the papers for presentation at the 4th International Conference on legal, security and privacy issues in information technology law, to be held in Sliema, Malta on November 3-5, 2009. The Conference is an opportunity for academics, practitioners and consultants to come together, exchange ideas, and discuss emerging issues in IT law and the emerging technological environment.
The conference committee is seeking submission of papers for oral presentations; both academic, peer reviewed papers and presentations based on short abstract and non-academic papers. Full research papers must be submitted by September 20, 2009. Abstract presentations may be submitted by October 15.
For complete submission guidelines, suggested topics, and forms, please visit the call for papers page on the conference website.
| April 25, 2009 |
Kinch Hoekstra (Berkeley Law), The History of Mixed Government and the Future of Absolutism
Merritt B. Fox (Columbia Law), Fraud-on-the-Market Actions Against Foreign Issuers
Florencia Marotta-Wurgler (NYU Law), Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? A Test of the Informed Minority Hypothesis Using Clickstream Data
Nina Tarr (Illinois College of Law), Law of Lawyering and Managing an Internal Law School Clinic
| April 25, 2009 |
Florencia Marotta-Wurgler (NYU Law), Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? A Test of the Informed Minority Hypothesis Using Clickstream Data
Nina Tarr (Illinois College of Law), Law of Lawyering and Managing an Internal Law School Clinic
Anup Malani (Temple Law)
| May 20, 2009 | to | May 21, 2009 |
The British Institute of International and Comparative Law presents the Ninth Annual WTO Conference May 20-21, 2009. Day One is on WTO Dispute Resolution; Day Two discusses The WTO in a Broader Context. The event is organized in association with the Institute of International Economic Law (Georgetown Law), the Journal of International Economic Law, and the Society of International Economic Law.
The British Institute of International and Comparative Law presents the Ninth Annual WTO Conference May 20-21, 2009. Day One is on WTO Dispute Resolution; Day Two discusses The WTO in a Broader Context. The event is organized in association with the Institute of International Economic Law (Georgetown Law), the Journal of International Economic Law, and the Society of International Economic Law.
Nelson Tebbe (Brooklyn Law), Constitutional Borrowing
Henry Monaghan (Columbia Law), Supremacy Clause Fundamentalism
Dennis M. Patterson (Rutgers-Camden Law)
Robert Starssfeld (Case Law), How the Cleveland Bar Became Segregated: 1870-1930
Washington University in St. Louis
Lior Strahilevitz (Chicago Law), The Right to Abandon
| April 23, 2009 |
Nelson Tebbe (Brooklyn Law), Constitutional Borrowing
Henry Monaghan (Columbia Law), Supremacy Clause Fundamentalism
Dennis M. Patterson (Rutgers-Camden Law)
Robert Starssfeld (Case Law), How the Cleveland Bar Became Segregated: 1870-1930
Washington University in St. Louis
Lior Strahilevitz (Chicago Law), The Right to Abandon
Alexander Capron (USC Law), The Circulatory-Respiratory Determination of Death in Organ Donation
Ariela Dubler (Columbia Law), Sexing Skinner: Marriage, Procreation and the Legal Family
Charles Weisselberg (UC Berkeley Law)
Michael Perry (Emory Law), Protecting Constitutionally Entrenched Human Rights: What Role for the Courts?
David T. Ritchie (Mercer Law), Legal Writing: Gateway to the Legal Discourse Community
Lawrence Repeta (Washington Law), Human rights in Japan and the efforts of Japan’s NGOS before the UN Human Rights Committee
| April 22, 2009 |
Alexander Capron (USC Law), The Circulatory-Respiratory Determination of Death in Organ Donation
Ariela Dubler (Columbia Law), Sexing Skinner: Marriage, Procreation and the Legal Family
Charles Weisselberg (UC Berkeley Law)
Michael Perry (Emory Law), Protecting Constitutionally Entrenched Human Rights: What Role for the Courts?
David T. Ritchie (Mercer Law), Legal Writing: Gateway to the Legal Discourse Community
Lawrence Repeta (Washington Law), Human rights in Japan and the efforts of Japan’s NGOS before the UN Human Rights Committee
Matthew Spitzer (USC Law), Television Duopoly in Small Markets: The Effect on Diversity
Dale Goble (Idaho Law), Threats and Risks: Assessing a Species’s Vulnerability to Extinction
Brandt Goldstein (New York Law)
James Anderson (RAND Institute for Civil Justice), Towards an Empirical Theory of Tort Law
| June 1, 2009 |
Difficult economic times are upon us. As a result, both the public and private sectors have been forced to make difficult budgetary decisions. The effects of these decisions have reverberated throughout our nation. In response to this crisis and in an effort to illuminate the effects of this economic downturn upon Maine’s legal system and legal systems nationally, the Maine Law Review will publish a Spring 2010 symposium issue entitled: “Accessing Justice in Hard Times: Lessons from the Field, Looking to the Future.”
The topic is construed broadly in order to provide an opportunity for a wide variety of viewpoints on a nearly limitless range of sub-topics. This symposium will not be a “traditional” law review publication, as such. The issue will present an interdisciplinary perspective on the subject and include theoretical, empirical, and practical pieces by authors with a variety of backgrounds.
The deadline for expressions of interest in writing for this symposium issue is June 1, 2009. The deadline for submissions to be considered for the Spring 2010 symposium is October 1, 2009.
Submissions are welcome via Expresso or by email: mainelawrevieweditor [at] gmail.com
Please contact Tina H. Nadeau, Editor-in-Chief, at tina.h.nadeau [at] gmail.com for more information about this symposium or to express interest in submitting an article.
Difficult economic times are upon us. As a result, both the public and private sectors have been forced to make difficult budgetary decisions. The effects of these decisions have reverberated throughout our nation. In response to this crisis and in an effort to illuminate the effects of this economic downturn upon Maine’s legal system and legal systems nationally, the Maine Law Review will publish a Spring 2010 symposium issue entitled: “Accessing Justice in Hard Times: Lessons from the Field, Looking to the Future.”
The topic is construed broadly in order to provide an opportunity for a wide variety of viewpoints on a nearly limitless range of sub-topics. This symposium will not be a “traditional” law review publication, as such. The issue will present an interdisciplinary perspective on the subject and include theoretical, empirical, and practical pieces by authors with a variety of backgrounds.
The deadline for expressions of interest in writing for this symposium issue is June 1, 2009. The deadline for submissions to be considered for the Spring 2010 symposium is October 1, 2009.
Submissions are welcome via Expresso or by email: mainelawrevieweditor [at] gmail.com
Please contact Tina H. Nadeau, Editor-in-Chief, at tina.h.nadeau [at] gmail.com for more information about this symposium or to express interest in submitting an article.
The Connecticut Law Review‘s fall symposium will be “Redefining Work: Exploring the Legal Implications of the Four-Day Work Week.” It will be held at the University of Connecticut School of Law in October 2009. For information, contact symposium co-editors Patrick Murphy (patrick.murphy [at] students.law.uconn.edu) and John Langmaid (jabl [at] lat46north.com).
| April 21, 2009 |
Matthew Spitzer (USC Law), Television Duopoly in Small Markets: The Effect on Diversity
Dale Goble (Idaho Law), Threats and Risks: Assessing a Species’s Vulnerability to Extinction
Brandt Goldstein (New York Law)
James Anderson (RAND Institute for Civil Justice), Towards an Empirical Theory of Tort Law
Cynthia Skach (Oxford Politics)
Margret Meyer (Oxford)
Juliet M. Moringiello (Widener Law)
Michael Carrier (Rutgers Camden Law)
Jacob Hacker (Berkeley Poli. Sci.), Yes, We Can? The New Push for American Health Security
Eugene Volokh (UCLA Law), Facilitative Constitutional Rights
Jannine Bell (Indiana University), Hate Speech and Hate Crime
Yale Workplace Theory and Policy
| April 20, 2009 |
Cynthia Skach (Oxford Politics)
Margret Meyer (Oxford)
Juliet M. Moringiello (Widener Law)
Michael Carrier (Rutgers Camden Law)
Jacob Hacker (Berkeley Poli. Sci.), Yes, We Can? The New Push for American Health Security
Eugene Volokh (UCLA Law), Facilitative Constitutional Rights
Jannine Bell (Indiana University), Hate Speech and Hate Crime
Yale Workplace Theory and Policy
| May 15, 2009 | ||
| October 2, 2009 |
In connection with the law school’s 20th anniversary celebration, the Texas Wesleyan Law
Review is pleased to host a symposium on Friday, October 2 , 2009, on the topic of “The Role of Lawyers of Color: Past, Present, & Future.” The purpose of the symposium is to explore and examine a range of historical, current, and future issues that surround lawyers of color.
The editors are now accepting proposals for papers and panel presentations on issues related to this symposium topic. Examples of the types of topics include but are not limited to:
The historical relevance and importance of lawyers of color
Interested authors and presenters should submit an abstract of not more than 250 words to symposiumeditor@law.txwes.edu by May 15, 2009. Authors and presenters will be informed by June 15, 2009 of the outcome of the initial review process. Final papers will be due on October 30, 2009. Accepted papers will be published in the Texas Wesleyan Law Review in a special symposium issue, and authors will be expected to present at the symposium.
For full panel proposals, please submit the panel topic as well as possible panelists. If you would like to serve as the panel moderator, please indicate that on your proposal.
The law review expects to be able to offer limited honorariums to help offset the cost of travel and accommodations.
Questions and requests for further information can be directed to Amanda Buffington, Symposium Editor Texas Wesleyan Law Review at symposiumeditor@law.txwes.edu. Faculty advisors include Professors Carla Pratt and Jason Gillmer.
In connection with the law school’s 20th anniversary celebration, the Texas Wesleyan Law
Review is pleased to host a symposium on Friday, October 2 , 2009, on the topic of “The Role of Lawyers of Color: Past, Present, & Future.” The purpose of the symposium is to explore and examine a range of historical, current, and future issues that surround lawyers of color.
The editors are now accepting proposals for papers and panel presentations on issues related to this symposium topic. Examples of the types of topics include but are not limited to:
The historical relevance and importance of lawyers of color
Interested authors and presenters should submit an abstract of not more than 250 words to symposiumeditor@law.txwes.edu by May 15, 2009. Authors and presenters will be informed by June 15, 2009 of the outcome of the initial review process. Final papers will be due on October 30, 2009. Accepted papers will be published in the Texas Wesleyan Law Review in a special symposium issue, and authors will be expected to present at the symposium.
For full panel proposals, please submit the panel topic as well as possible panelists. If you would like to serve as the panel moderator, please indicate that on your proposal.
The law review expects to be able to offer limited honorariums to help offset the cost of travel and accommodations.
Questions and requests for further information can be directed to Amanda Buffington, Symposium Editor Texas Wesleyan Law Review at symposiumeditor@law.txwes.edu. Faculty advisors include Professors Carla Pratt and Jason Gillmer.
The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy is a peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal which seeks articles from any jurisdiction on the broad theme of international trade. The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for current issues in all aspects of international trade, including legal, economic, management and policy issues. Articles should reflect the international focus of the journal but this does not preclude articles from a single jurisdiction which are of international interest.
The Editor of the Journal of International Trade Law and Policy now invites submissions to the journal. Of particular interest are contributions in:
Papers can be between 6,000 and 10,000 words in length and will undergo a double blind peer review. The journal also publishes book reviews and case notes which should be around 1,500 words in total.
All articles should be submitted, preferably in Microsoft Word format and via e-mail to the Editor: Moe Alramahi, Email: m.alramahi@rgu.ac.uk
More details and author guidelines can be found on the journal homepage.
| June 18, 2009 |
On June 18, the American Antitrust Institute will host its 10th annual conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. This year’s conference is titled “International Antitrust in a World without a Center” and will focus on international challenges facing the antitrust community.
The AAI is honored to host Mario Monti, former European commissioner for competition and now president of the Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi in Milan, and John Fingleton, the chief executive officer of the U.K. Office of Fair Trading, as speakers on the June 18 program.
A complete agenda and online registration are available at the conference website.
On June 18, the American Antitrust Institute will host its 10th annual conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. This year’s conference is titled “International Antitrust in a World without a Center” and will focus on international challenges facing the antitrust community.
The AAI is honored to host Mario Monti, former European commissioner for competition and now president of the Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi in Milan, and John Fingleton, the chief executive officer of the U.K. Office of Fair Trading, as speakers on the June 18 program.
A complete agenda and online registration are available at the conference website.
| July 1, 2009 |
Entries will be accepted through July 1, 2009, for the Chicago-Kent College of Law/Roy C. Palmer Civil Liberties Prize.
The Chicago-Kent College of Law/Roy C. Palmer Civil Liberties Prize was established in spring 2007 by alumnus Roy C. Palmer ’62 and his wife, Susan M. Palmer, to honor a work of scholarship exploring the tension between civil liberties and national security in contemporary American society.
The $10,000 prize is designed to encourage and reward public debate among scholars on current issues affecting the rights of individuals and the responsibilities of governments throughout the world.
The article or book must be in draft form or have been published within the six months prior to the July 1 deadline. As a condition of accepting the award, the winner will present his or her work at Chicago-Kent. All reasonable expenses will be paid.
Please submit entries to Ms. Tasha Kincade, assistant to Dean Harold J. Krent, at tkincade@kentlaw.edu.
Roy Palmer, a lawyer and real estate developer, is a 1962 honors graduate of Chicago-Kent and a member of its board of overseers. He and his wife, Susan, active in numerous civic, social and philanthropic organizations, are the recipients of the 1997 Outstanding Individual Philanthropist Award of the National Society of Fundraising Executives.
Entries will be accepted through July 1, 2009, for the Chicago-Kent College of Law/Roy C. Palmer Civil Liberties Prize.
The Chicago-Kent College of Law/Roy C. Palmer Civil Liberties Prize was established in spring 2007 by alumnus Roy C. Palmer ’62 and his wife, Susan M. Palmer, to honor a work of scholarship exploring the tension between civil liberties and national security in contemporary American society.
The $10,000 prize is designed to encourage and reward public debate among scholars on current issues affecting the rights of individuals and the responsibilities of governments throughout the world.
The article or book must be in draft form or have been published within the six months prior to the July 1 deadline. As a condition of accepting the award, the winner will present his or her work at Chicago-Kent. All reasonable expenses will be paid.
Please submit entries to Ms. Tasha Kincade, assistant to Dean Harold J. Krent, at tkincade@kentlaw.edu.
Roy Palmer, a lawyer and real estate developer, is a 1962 honors graduate of Chicago-Kent and a member of its board of overseers. He and his wife, Susan, active in numerous civic, social and philanthropic organizations, are the recipients of the 1997 Outstanding Individual Philanthropist Award of the National Society of Fundraising Executives.
The American Society of International Law’s (ASIL) independent Task Force on U.S. Policy Toward the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued its report at a press conference on Friday, March 27, 2009, during the ASIL Annual Meeting in Washington D.C.
In the fall of 2008, the American Society of International Law convened this blue-ribbon task force to examine the U.S. relationship with the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ASIL Task Force on U.S. Policy Toward the ICC studied the Court’s work to date, reviewed current U.S. policy toward the Court, and developed recommendations that can inform the U.S. approach toward the Court.
The full report, as well as transcripts and audio of the announcement, are available at the Task Force’s website.
James Gathii (Albany Law), War, Commerce and International Law
Minnesota Faculty Works in Progress
Susan Haack (Miami Law), Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert
Northwestern Law and Economics
Gillian Hadfield (USC Law), The Dynamic Quality of Law: The Role of Judicial Incentives and Legal Human Capital in the Adaptation of Law
| May 10, 2009 |
NUJS Journal of Law & Society is currently soliciting submissions for its inaugural issue due in September, 2009. The deadline for submissions for the 2009 issue is May 10, 2009. The submissions would go through a two-staged peer review process and edited by the student editorial board. For general queries relating to your submissions, see the ‘Note to Authors’ or kindly write to us at nujs.jls@gmail.com.NUJS Journal of Law & Society is a new, peer-reviewed and student-edited journal of interdisciplinary studies on law and society. It is based at and published from The National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata. The journal seeks to present a dedicated forum of debate for work bearing upon the cultural, economic, political and social lives of law in India. Published annually in September, the journal solicits articles, notes and comments covering judicial decisions, legislative developments, empirical research on Indian legal system, public policy studies and theoretical analysis from related fields of inquiry. We welcome submissions from academics, practitioners, policymakers and students from within the legal community and have a strong preference for articles that are not descriptive but prescriptive and argumentatively focused. In addition to the above, we accept new ideas and perspectives under the ‘Essays’ category of the journal. Essays are reviewed for their potential contribution to existing scholarship but most significantly, to seek the possibility of a new approach to an old theme.
NUJS Journal of Law & Society is currently soliciting submissions for its inaugural issue due in September, 2009. The deadline for submissions for the 2009 issue is May 10, 2009. The submissions would go through a two-staged peer review process and edited by the student editorial board. For general queries relating to your submissions, see the ‘Note to Authors’ or kindly write to us at nujs.jls@gmail.com.NUJS Journal of Law & Society is a new, peer-reviewed and student-edited journal of interdisciplinary studies on law and society. It is based at and published from The National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata. The journal seeks to present a dedicated forum of debate for work bearing upon the cultural, economic, political and social lives of law in India. Published annually in September, the journal solicits articles, notes and comments covering judicial decisions, legislative developments, empirical research on Indian legal system, public policy studies and theoretical analysis from related fields of inquiry. We welcome submissions from academics, practitioners, policymakers and students from within the legal community and have a strong preference for articles that are not descriptive but prescriptive and argumentatively focused. In addition to the above, we accept new ideas and perspectives under the ‘Essays’ category of the journal. Essays are reviewed for their potential contribution to existing scholarship but most significantly, to seek the possibility of a new approach to an old theme.
Yesterday (April 14, 2009), Mary Margaret Giannini (Florida Coastal) delivered “Searching for Reasonableness: Procedural Justice and the Victim’s Right to be Reasonably Protected from the Accused” as the Stephanie K. Seymour Lecture at the University of Tulsa College of Law.
| May 13, 2009 |
The University of Girona hosts Neutrality and Theory of Law May 20-22, 2010. The conference commemorates the first fifty volumes in Marcial Pons publishers’ Philosophy and Law collection. Universtat Pampeu Fabra is also an organizer of the conference.
Our aim is that the conference will be a meeting place for authors and readers of our books. For this reason twelve authors from the collection will be speakers at the event Dr. Robert Alexy, Dr. Juan C. Bayón, Dr. Brian Bix, Dr. Eugenio Bulygin, Dr. Bruno Celano, Dr. Jules L. Coleman, Dr. Riccardo Guastini, Dr. Brian Leiter, Dr. Jorge Luis Rodríguez, Dr. Frederick Schauer, Dr. Scott J. Shapiro, Dr. Wilfrid J. Waluchow. We have chosen the theme “neutrality and theory of Law” as the backbone of the speeches because it is one of the most frequently found, either directly or indirectly, in the books of the collection
Our objective is to offer an event of the utmost magnitude in the iusphilosophical debate that will gather the different legal traditions, addressed specifically toward the Hispanic-American community.
Registration for this event is now available at the conference website.
The University of Girona hosts Neutrality and Theory of Law May 20-22, 2010. The conference commemorates the first fifty volumes in Marcial Pons publishers’ Philosophy and Law collection. Universtat Pampeu Fabra is also an organizer of the conference.
Our aim is that the conference will be a meeting place for authors and readers of our books. For this reason twelve authors from the collection will be speakers at the event Dr. Robert Alexy, Dr. Juan C. Bayón, Dr. Brian Bix, Dr. Eugenio Bulygin, Dr. Bruno Celano, Dr. Jules L. Coleman, Dr. Riccardo Guastini, Dr. Brian Leiter, Dr. Jorge Luis Rodríguez, Dr. Frederick Schauer, Dr. Scott J. Shapiro, Dr. Wilfrid J. Waluchow. We have chosen the theme “neutrality and theory of Law” as the backbone of the speeches because it is one of the most frequently found, either directly or indirectly, in the books of the collection
Our objective is to offer an event of the utmost magnitude in the iusphilosophical debate that will gather the different legal traditions, addressed specifically toward the Hispanic-American community.
Registration for this event is now available at the conference website.
| May 15, 2009 |
Call for Articles, Essays, and Book Reviews: National Security and Constitutional Law
Proposals due May 15, 2009
The editors of Pace Law Review invite proposals from scholars, researchers, practitioners, and professionals for contributions to a special issue on the relationship between national security and constitutional law to be published in Winter 2010.
Pace Law School is dedicated to advancing a greater understanding among scholars and the legal community concerning the role of constitutional law in national security concerns. This law review issue will promote an ongoing discourse on the balance between constitutional rights and effective national security.
Please submit proposals of no more than 500 words by attachment to plr@law.pace.edu by May 15, 2009. All proposals should include the intended author’s name, title, institutional affiliation, contact information, and should concern issues related to the relationship between national security and constitutional law. Book review proposals should also include (a) the title and publication date of the book proposed for review; (b) a description of the importance of the book to the general topic; and (c) any other information relevant to the book or proposed review (e.g., the reviewer’s expertise or any relationship with the author). Authors are also welcome, but not required, to submit a CV. We expect to make publication offers by June 1. We encourage clear, concise, and accessible writing that will be of use to lawmakers, attorneys, and students.
Completed manuscripts of book reviews and essays will be due July 15, 2009. Completed manuscripts of scholarly articles will be due August 1, 2009.
Call for Articles, Essays, and Book Reviews: National Security and Constitutional Law
Proposals due May 15, 2009
The editors of Pace Law Review invite proposals from scholars, researchers, practitioners, and professionals for contributions to a special issue on the relationship between national security and constitutional law to be published in Winter 2010.
Pace Law School is dedicated to advancing a greater understanding among scholars and the legal community concerning the role of constitutional law in national security concerns. This law review issue will promote an ongoing discourse on the balance between constitutional rights and effective national security.
Please submit proposals of no more than 500 words by attachment to plr@law.pace.edu by May 15, 2009. All proposals should include the intended author’s name, title, institutional affiliation, contact information, and should concern issues related to the relationship between national security and constitutional law. Book review proposals should also include (a) the title and publication date of the book proposed for review; (b) a description of the importance of the book to the general topic; and (c) any other information relevant to the book or proposed review (e.g., the reviewer’s expertise or any relationship with the author). Authors are also welcome, but not required, to submit a CV. We expect to make publication offers by June 1. We encourage clear, concise, and accessible writing that will be of use to lawmakers, attorneys, and students.
Completed manuscripts of book reviews and essays will be due July 15, 2009. Completed manuscripts of scholarly articles will be due August 1, 2009.
| April 24, 2009 | ||
| 2:30 pm | to | 5:30 pm |
The Administrative Law Review (American University Washington College of Law) presents Is Chevron Out of Gas? The State of Judicial Review 25 Years After Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. April 24, 2009, 2:30-5:30. The keynote address is by Justice Antonin Scalia. A panel discussion, moderated by Mark Niles, will include J. Peter Coll, David Frederick, Ron Levin, and Richard Murphy.
The Administrative Law Review (American University Washington College of Law) presents Is Chevron Out of Gas? The State of Judicial Review 25 Years After Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. April 24, 2009, 2:30-5:30. The keynote address is by Justice Antonin Scalia. A panel discussion, moderated by Mark Niles, will include J. Peter Coll, David Frederick, Ron Levin, and Richard Murphy.
| July 31, 2009 |
The Michigan State University College of Law is pleased to announce that the Second Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop will take place on its campus October 22–23, 2009. The inaugural workshop, held in April 2008 at the American University Washington College of Law, was a resounding success attended by junior scholars from 30 law schools, resulting in publications in numerous preeminent journals. We aim to continue this tradition.
The workshop pairs junior and senior, federal-courts scholars in a day-long, works-in-progress workshop. Senior scholars who have confirmed their attendance for this year’s workshop are Susan Bandes (DePaul University School of Law), Martha Field (Harvard Law School), Martin Redish (Northwestern University School of Law), and David Shapiro (Harvard Law School).
Workshop Agenda
Drafts of papers will be distributed to participants prior to the workshop, which begins with dinner on Thursday, October 22. On Friday, October 23, following breakfast, two panels of junior scholars, composed of three to four persons each, will present papers in the morning. After lunch, two panels of junior scholars will present papers in the afternoon. Each panel will be assigned a senior scholar who will provide commentary on the paper and lead the group discussion.
Invitees
The workshop is open to non-tenured, or newly tenured, academics who teach Federal Courts (or an equivalent course) or whose scholarly agenda encompasses topics ordinarily associated with such a course. Those who do not currently hold a faculty appointment but expect that they will during the 2010-2011 academic year are also welcome. There is no registration fee for this conference.
RSVP
Those who plan to attend the workshop are asked to RSVP by July 31, 2009 to Sally Rice at Michigan State University College of Law (events@law.msu.edu). Please indicate whether you will attend the dinner on October 22.
Persons wishing to present a paper are asked to e-mail an abstract by June 29, 2009 to Lou Mulligan (mulligan@law.msu.edu). A committee of past participants will select papers no later than July 3, 2009.
Michigan State College of Law is pleased to provide all participants with meals while attending the workshop and has secured a block of rooms at a discounted rate.
| June 29, 2009 |
The Michigan State University College of Law is pleased to announce that the Second Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop will take place on its campus October 22–23, 2009. The inaugural workshop, held in April 2008 at the American University Washington College of Law, was a resounding success attended by junior scholars from 30 law schools, resulting in publications in numerous preeminent journals. We aim to continue this tradition.
The workshop pairs junior and senior, federal-courts scholars in a day-long, works-in-progress workshop. Senior scholars who have confirmed their attendance for this year’s workshop are Susan Bandes (DePaul University School of Law), Martha Field (Harvard Law School), Martin Redish (Northwestern University School of Law), and David Shapiro (Harvard Law School).
Workshop Agenda
Drafts of papers will be distributed to participants prior to the workshop, which begins with dinner on Thursday, October 22. On Friday, October 23, following breakfast, two panels of junior scholars, composed of three to four persons each, will present papers in the morning. After lunch, two panels of junior scholars will present papers in the afternoon. Each panel will be assigned a senior scholar who will provide commentary on the paper and lead the group discussion.
Invitees
The workshop is open to non-tenured, or newly tenured, academics who teach Federal Courts (or an equivalent course) or whose scholarly agenda encompasses topics ordinarily associated with such a course. Those who do not currently hold a faculty appointment but expect that they will during the 2010-2011 academic year are also welcome. There is no registration fee for this conference.
RSVP
Those who plan to attend the workshop are asked to RSVP by July 31, 2009 to Sally Rice at Michigan State University College of Law (events@law.msu.edu). Please indicate whether you will attend the dinner on October 22.
Persons wishing to present a paper are asked to e-mail an abstract by June 29, 2009 to Lou Mulligan (mulligan@law.msu.edu). A committee of past participants will select papers no later than July 3, 2009.
Michigan State College of Law is pleased to provide all participants with meals while attending the workshop and has secured a block of rooms at a discounted rate.
| October 23, 2009 | ||
| 6:00 pm | to | 9:00 pm |
| October 24, 2009 | ||
The Michigan State University College of Law is pleased to announce that the Second Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop will take place on its campus October 22–23, 2009. The inaugural workshop, held in April 2008 at the American University Washington College of Law, was a resounding success attended by junior scholars from 30 law schools, resulting in publications in numerous preeminent journals. We aim to continue this tradition.
The workshop pairs junior and senior, federal-courts scholars in a day-long, works-in-progress workshop. Senior scholars who have confirmed their attendance for this year’s workshop are Susan Bandes (DePaul University School of Law), Martha Field (Harvard Law School), Martin Redish (Northwestern University School of Law), and David Shapiro (Harvard Law School).
Workshop Agenda
Drafts of papers will be distributed to participants prior to the workshop, which begins with dinner on Thursday, October 22. On Friday, October 23, following breakfast, two panels of junior scholars, composed of three to four persons each, will present papers in the morning. After lunch, two panels of junior scholars will present papers in the afternoon. Each panel will be assigned a senior scholar who will provide commentary on the paper and lead the group discussion.
Invitees
The workshop is open to non-tenured, or newly tenured, academics who teach Federal Courts (or an equivalent course) or whose scholarly agenda encompasses topics ordinarily associated with such a course. Those who do not currently hold a faculty appointment but expect that they will during the 2010-2011 academic year are also welcome. There is no registration fee for this conference.
RSVP
Those who plan to attend the workshop are asked to RSVP by July 31, 2009 to Sally Rice at Michigan State University College of Law (events@law.msu.edu). Please indicate whether you will attend the dinner on October 22.
Persons wishing to present a paper are asked to e-mail an abstract by June 29, 2009 to Lou Mulligan (mulligan@law.msu.edu). A committee of past participants will select papers no later than July 3, 2009.
Michigan State College of Law is pleased to provide all participants with meals while attending the workshop and has secured a block of rooms at a discounted rate.
The Michigan State University College of Law is pleased to announce that the Second Annual Junior Faculty Federal Courts Workshop will take place on its campus October 22–23, 2009. The inaugural workshop, held in April 2008 at the American University Washington College of Law, was a resounding success attended by junior scholars from 30 law schools, resulting in publications in numerous preeminent journals. We aim to continue this tradition.
The workshop pairs junior and senior, federal-courts scholars in a day-long, works-in-progress workshop. Senior scholars who have confirmed their attendance for this year’s workshop are Susan Bandes (DePaul University School of Law), Martha Field (Harvard Law School), Martin Redish (Northwestern University School of Law), and David Shapiro (Harvard Law School).
Workshop Agenda
Drafts of papers will be distributed to participants prior to the workshop, which begins with dinner on Thursday, October 22. On Friday, October 23, following breakfast, two panels of junior scholars, composed of three to four persons each, will present papers in the morning. After lunch, two panels of junior scholars will present papers in the afternoon. Each panel will be assigned a senior scholar who will provide commentary on the paper and lead the group discussion.
Invitees
The workshop is open to non-tenured, or newly tenured, academics who teach Federal Courts (or an equivalent course) or whose scholarly agenda encompasses topics ordinarily associated with such a course. Those who do not currently hold a faculty appointment but expect that they will during the 2010-2011 academic year are also welcome. There is no registration fee for this conference.
RSVP
Those who plan to attend the workshop are asked to RSVP by July 31, 2009 to Sally Rice at Michigan State University College of Law (events@law.msu.edu). Please indicate whether you will attend the dinner on October 22.
Persons wishing to present a paper are asked to e-mail an abstract by June 29, 2009 to Lou Mulligan (mulligan@law.msu.edu). A committee of past participants will select papers no later than July 3, 2009.
Michigan State College of Law is pleased to provide all participants with meals while attending the workshop and has secured a block of rooms at a discounted rate.
Mario L. Barnes (Connecticut Law)
Allison Hoffman and Christopher Robertson (Harvard Law), Oil and Water: The Trouble with Individual Mandates. Fragmented Markets, and Health Reform and The Blind Expert: A Litigant-Driven Solution to Bias and Error
David Tanenhaus (UNLC History), Gerald’s Story: Children, Crime, and the Pursuit of Justice
Roger Alford (Pepperdine Law), Arbitrating Human Rights
| April 16, 2009 |
James Gathii (Albany Law), War, Commerce and International Law
Minnesota Faculty Works in Progress
Susan Haack (Miami Law), Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert
Northwestern Law and Economics
Gillian Hadfield (USC Law), The Dynamic Quality of Law: The Role of Judicial Incentives and Legal Human Capital in the Adaptation of Law
| April 14, 2009 |
Mario L. Barnes (Connecticut Law)
Allison Hoffman and Christopher Robertson (Harvard Law), Oil and Water: The Trouble with Individual Mandates. Fragmented Markets, and Health Reform and The Blind Expert: A Litigant-Driven Solution to Bias and Error
David Tanenhaus (UNLC History), Gerald’s Story: Children, Crime, and the Pursuit of Justice
Roger Alford (Pepperdine Law), Arbitrating Human Rights
James Liebman (Columbia Law), Can School Reform Create New Politics? Will Old Politics Kill School Reform?
Chris Brummer (Vanderbilt Law)
| April 14, 2009 |
James Liebman (Columbia Law), Can School Reform Create New Politics? Will Old Politics Kill School Reform?
Chris Brummer (Vanderbilt Law)
Victoria Nourse (Wisconsin Law), A Tale of Two Lochners (Why Lochner and Roe are Not Twins)
Michael Carrier (Rutgers Camden)
Daniela Caruso (Boston Law), The Law of Autism
Dara Strolovicth (Minnesota Poli. Sci.), Affirmative Advocacy in Hard Times: Representing Marginalized Groups in Times of National Crisis
Honorable Frank H. Easterbrook (7th Circuit), Public Choice and Legal Interpretation
Yale Workplace Theory and Policy
| April 13, 2009 |
Victoria Nourse (Wisconsin Law), A Tale of Two Lochners (Why Lochner and Roe are Not Twins)
Michael Carrier (Rutgers Camden)
Daniela Caruso (Boston Law), The Law of Autism
Dara Strolovicth (Minnesota Poli. Sci.), Affirmative Advocacy in Hard Times: Representing Marginalized Groups in Times of National Crisis
Honorable Frank H. Easterbrook (7th Circuit), Public Choice and Legal Interpretation
Yale Workplace Theory and Policy
| April 17, 2009 | ||
| 10:30 am | to | 2:30 pm |
Florida Coastal School of Law presents the 2009 Sports Law Symposium, NCAA Coaches’ Contracts: Diversity and Negotiating Value in the 21st Century, April 17, 2009, 10:30-2:30. It is sponsored by the Coastal Law Center for Law and Sports and the Coastal Law Sports Law Society.
Florida Coastal School of Law presents the 2009 Sports Law Symposium, NCAA Coaches’ Contracts: Diversity and Negotiating Value in the 21st Century, April 17, 2009, 10:30-2:30. It is sponsored by the Coastal Law Center for Law and Sports and the Coastal Law Sports Law Society.
The Charleston Law Review, the flagship law review of the Charleston School of Law, invites submissions for its Supreme Court Preview issue. Authors are welcome to submit an article or essay addressing a case before the Court in its October 2009 Term, or in the alternative, addressing an aspect of the Court itself such as recent voting trends, case load, an analysis of a particular Justice, or any other topic related to the Supreme Court.
Last year, the Supreme Court Preview included a diverse spectrum of works ranging from articles that examined cases argued in the Court’s October 2008 Term to articles that analyzed current voting trends among the Court. For example, in Crime Labs and Prison Guards: A Comment on Melendez-Diaz and Its Potential Impact on Capital Sentencing Proceedings, John Blume and Emily Paavola argued that the Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts could resolve conflicting authority on what constitutes testimonial hearsay under Crawford v. Washington and could have a dramatic impact on the criminal justice system, particularly capital sentencing proceedings. Alternatively, in The Roberts Court and Criminal Justice at the Dawn of the 2008 Term, Professors Christopher E. Smith, Michael A. McCall, and Madhavi M. McCall introduced empirical decision-making patterns from the initial three terms of the Roberts Court in an attempt to ascertain how the Court would likely determine three Fourth Amendment cases in the Court’s October 2008 Term.
The Supreme Court Preview is published to coincide with the opening of the October Term 2009, and the editors therefore ask that work be submitted no later than August 1, 2009. Submissions will be reviewed on a rolling basis beginning July 1, 2009. Please direct submissions and any questions about the Supreme Court Preview to Ben Garner, Editor in Chief, via email at bgarner@charlestonlaw.edu or via telephone at (434) 941-9831.
| May 1, 2009 |
Announcing a call for papers to be included in a Disaster Law Reader to coincide with the 5th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina.
Nearly five years have passed since Katrina wreaked havoc on the Gulf, and since that time, we’ve seen families reunited, schools rebuilt, and neighborhoods repaired. Yet for thousands of residents, legal issues remain unresolved and individual needs remain unmet. For these reasons, the five year anniversary of Katrina provides aspiring lawyers an opportunity to examine the legal and social implications of disaster by considering how the law could have been used to mitigate the impact and aftermath of the storm.
This notice calls for papers to be included in an edited collection on legal issues related to disaster preparation, management, and recovery. The editors will be seeking publication with an appropriate academic publisher. Sample topics and full details are available here.
Both completed articles (previously published or unpublished) and abstracts of works in progress will be considered. Papers with a multi-disciplinary or extra-legal focus are welcome.
Completed articles or essays must be submitted no later than August 1, 2009. If you wish to have a piece considered prior to completion, please submit an abstract of no more than two pages no later than May 1, 2009. You will receive a provisional acceptance by June 1 and be asked to submit a completed piece by August 1. A final decision on acceptance of a completed work will be made on or about September 1, 2009. Please also include a CV and full contact information.
Proposals and papers should be sent electronically to both editors. Please feel free to contact one or both to talk over your ideas or for more information: Kathleen A. Bergin (kbergin@stcl.edu) or Tracy L. McGaugh (tmcgaugh@tourolaw.edu).
Announcing a call for papers to be included in a Disaster Law Reader to coincide with the 5th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina.
Nearly five years have passed since Katrina wreaked havoc on the Gulf, and since that time, we’ve seen families reunited, schools rebuilt, and neighborhoods repaired. Yet for thousands of residents, legal issues remain unresolved and individual needs remain unmet. For these reasons, the five year anniversary of Katrina provides aspiring lawyers an opportunity to examine the legal and social implications of disaster by considering how the law could have been used to mitigate the impact and aftermath of the storm.
This notice calls for papers to be included in an edited collection on legal issues related to disaster preparation, management, and recovery. The editors will be seeking publication with an appropriate academic publisher. Sample topics and full details are available here.
Both completed articles (previously published or unpublished) and abstracts of works in progress will be considered. Papers with a multi-disciplinary or extra-legal focus are welcome.
Completed articles or essays must be submitted no later than August 1, 2009. If you wish to have a piece considered prior to completion, please submit an abstract of no more than two pages no later than May 1, 2009. You will receive a provisional acceptance by June 1 and be asked to submit a completed piece by August 1. A final decision on acceptance of a completed work will be made on or about September 1, 2009. Please also include a CV and full contact information.
Proposals and papers should be sent electronically to both editors. Please feel free to contact one or both to talk over your ideas or for more information: Kathleen A. Bergin (kbergin@stcl.edu) or Tracy L. McGaugh (tmcgaugh@tourolaw.edu).
| April 17, 2009 |
Rutgers Law Review presents its 2009 Symposium, “A Legal Education Prospectus: Law Schools & Emerging Frontiers in Curriculum, Lawyering, and Social Justice”. This event will take place Friday, April 17, 2009 at the Rutgers School of Law, Newark.
Speakers will discuss innovative approaches to legal education, including curricular reform, the use of technology, and the unique potential for law schools to inculcate public and professional values in students. An afternoon panel, composed of Rutgers Law alumni and professors, will focus exclusively on the role Rutgers Law in shaping the law in New Jersey via three cases —Abbot v. Burke, In re Quinlan, and In re Baby M.
The Symposium is free and open to students and the general public, but registration is required. Rutgers Law Review will provide breakfast, lunch, and a cocktail reception.
If you have questions or would like to register for the Symposium, please email Rutgers.symposium@gmail.com or call (973) 353-5931. For more information about the Symposium, please visit the symposium website.
Rutgers Law Review presents its 2009 Symposium, “A Legal Education Prospectus: Law Schools & Emerging Frontiers in Curriculum, Lawyering, and Social Justice”. This event will take place Friday, April 17, 2009 at the Rutgers School of Law, Newark.
Speakers will discuss innovative approaches to legal education, including curricular reform, the use of technology, and the unique potential for law schools to inculcate public and professional values in students. An afternoon panel, composed of Rutgers Law alumni and professors, will focus exclusively on the role Rutgers Law in shaping the law in New Jersey via three cases —Abbot v. Burke, In re Quinlan, and In re Baby M.
The Symposium is free and open to students and the general public, but registration is required. Rutgers Law Review will provide breakfast, lunch, and a cocktail reception.
If you have questions or would like to register for the Symposium, please email Rutgers.symposium@gmail.com or call (973) 353-5931. For more information about the Symposium, please visit the symposium website.
| April 17, 2009 | to | April 18, 2009 |
The Sturm College of Law of the University of Denver presents the Conceptualizing Substantive Justice Conference on April 17 – 18, 2009.
Conference sessions will focus on: Theoretical Perspectives on Substantive Justice, International and Comparative Approaches to Substantive Justice, and Incorporating Substantive Justice into Domestic U.S. Jurisprudence. Those interested in these or related questions are invited to obtain full program information and register via the conference website.
The Sturm College of Law of the University of Denver presents the Conceptualizing Substantive Justice Conference on April 17 – 18, 2009.
Conference sessions will focus on: Theoretical Perspectives on Substantive Justice, International and Comparative Approaches to Substantive Justice, and Incorporating Substantive Justice into Domestic U.S. Jurisprudence. Those interested in these or related questions are invited to obtain full program information and register via the conference website.
| April 16, 2009 |
The Program on Law and Government of the Washington College of Law, the American University Law Review and the Marshall‐Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project present a conference, Tinker Turns 40: Freedom of Expression at School and Its Meaning for American Democracy. The conference will be held on April 16, 2009 at American University Washington College of Law.
This event will mark the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District with panel discussions exploring the legacy of Tinker for First Amendment rights, not only in schools but in American society.
There is no attendance charge for this event, but registration is required. To register, please go to www.wcl.american.edu/secle/registration.
For further information about this event, please contact: Office of Special Events & Continuing
Legal Education, American University Washington College of Law, 202.274.4075 or
secle@wcl.american.edu.
The Program on Law and Government of the Washington College of Law, the American University Law Review and the Marshall‐Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project present a conference, Tinker Turns 40: Freedom of Expression at School and Its Meaning for American Democracy. The conference will be held on April 16, 2009 at American University Washington College of Law.
This event will mark the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District with panel discussions exploring the legacy of Tinker for First Amendment rights, not only in schools but in American society.
There is no attendance charge for this event, but registration is required. To register, please go to www.wcl.american.edu/secle/registration.
For further information about this event, please contact: Office of Special Events & Continuing
Legal Education, American University Washington College of Law, 202.274.4075 or
secle@wcl.american.edu.
Arizona Economics, Law, and The Environment
Dean Lueck (Arizona ELE), The Demarcation of Land and the role of Coordinating Institutions
Sharon Rabin-Margalioth (NYU Law), The Market Explanation (Excuse) for the Gender Pay Gap
Minnesota Faculty Works in Progress
Kim Forde-Mazzuri (Virginia Law), Tradition as a Suspect Justification: The Case of Different-Sex Marriage
David Schwartz (Wisconsin Law), Mandatory Arbitration and Fairness
| April 10, 2009 |
Arizona Economics, Law, and The Environment
Dean Lueck (Arizona ELE), The Demarcation of Land and the role of Coordinating Institutions
Sharon Rabin-Margalioth (NYU Law), The Market Explanation (Excuse) for the Gender Pay Gap
Minnesota Faculty Works in Progress
Kim Forde-Mazzuri (Virginia Law), Tradition as a Suspect Justification: The Case of Different-Sex Marriage
David Schwartz (Wisconsin Law), Mandatory Arbitration and Fairness
Merritt Fox (Columbia Law), Fraud-on-the-Market Class Actions Against Foreign Issuers
Fernando Teson (Florida State), The Liberal Constitution and Foreign Affairs
Jules Lobel (Pittsburgh Law), The Constitution Abroad: Extraterritorial Constitutional Restraints on Governmental Action After Boumediene
Quince Hopkins, (Florida Coastal Law)
| April 9, 2009 |
Merritt Fox (Columbia Law), Fraud-on-the-Market Class Actions Against Foreign Issuers
Fernando Teson (Florida State), The Liberal Constitution and Foreign Affairs
Jules Lobel (Pittsburgh Law), The Constitution Abroad: Extraterritorial Constitutional Restraints on Governmental Action After Boumediene
Quince Hopkins, (Florida Coastal Law)
Kate Baicker (Health Economics), Expanding Public Health Insurance
Northwestern Law and Political Economy
Vanessa Baird (Colorado Poli. Sci.) and Tonja Jacobi (Northwestern Law), How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court
Deborah Dinner (NYU Law), Debating Protective Legislation: The Origins of the Legal Sex/Gender Distinction, 1964-1974
Kathy Cerminara (Nova Southeastern Law), Open-Access Hospice: Compassionate Reimbursement Rules in Medicare
| April 8, 2009 |
Kate Baicker (Health Economics), Expanding Public Health Insurance
Northwestern Law and Political Economy
Vanessa Baird (Colorado Poli. Sci.) and Tonja Jacobi (Northwestern Law), How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court
Deborah Dinner (NYU Law), Debating Protective Legislation: The Origins of the Legal Sex/Gender Distinction, 1964-1974
Kathy Cerminara (Nova Southeastern Law), Open-Access Hospice: Compassionate Reimbursement Rules in Medicare
Chris Guthrie (Vanderbilt Law)
George Bermann (Columbia Law), U.S. Class Actions and the “Global Class”
Nina Mendelson (Michigan Law), Including ‘Political’ Reasons in Agency Decisionmaking
Eraldo Cacchione, The Implications of a University’s Jesuit Mission for a Law School
Lia Epperson (Santa Clara Law)
Terry Turnipseed (Syracuse Law), Scalia’s Ship of Revulsion Has Sailed: Will Lawrence Protect Adults Who Adopt Lovers to Help Ensure Their Inheritance from Incest Prosecution?
Francille Wilson (USC American Studies and Ethnicity), ‘Negroes Were Stirred-Up Long Before There Was a Communist Party’: Re-examining Black Lawyers Support for Human Rights Through the Lens of Gender and Generation
| August 1, 2009 |
The Charleston Law Review, the flagship law review of the Charleston School of Law, invites submissions for its Supreme Court Preview issue. We welcome an article or essay addressing a case before the Court in its October 2009 Term, or in the alternative, addressing an aspect of the Court itself such as recent voting trends, case load, an analysis of a particular Justice, or any other topic related to the Supreme Court.
Last year, our Supreme Court Preview included a diverse spectrum of works ranging from articles that examined cases argued in the Court’s October 2008 Term to articles that analyzed current voting trends among the Court. For example, in Crime Labs and Prison Guards: A Comment on Melendez-Diaz and Its Potential Impact on Capital Sentencing Proceedings, John Blume and Emily Paavola argued that the Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts could resolve conflicting authority on what constitutes testimonial hearsay under Crawford v. Washington and could have a dramatic impact on the criminal justice system, particularly capital sentencing proceedings. Alternatively, in The Roberts Court and Criminal Justice at the Dawn of the 2008 Term, Professors Christopher E. Smith, Michael A. McCall, and Madhavi M. McCall introduced empirical decision-making patterns from the initial three terms of the Roberts Court in an attempt to ascertain how the Court would likely determine three Fourth Amendment cases in the Court’s October 2008 Term.
The Supreme Court Preview is published to coincide with the opening of the October Term 2009, and we therefore ask that work be submitted no later than August 1, 2009. Submissions will be reviewed on a rolling basis beginning July 1, 2009. Please direct submissions and any questions about our Supreme Court Preview to Ben Garner, Editor in Chief, via email at bgarner [at] charlestonlaw.edu or via telephone at (434) 941-9831.
The Charleston Law Review, the flagship law review of the Charleston School of Law, invites submissions for its Supreme Court Preview issue. We welcome an article or essay addressing a case before the Court in its October 2009 Term, or in the alternative, addressing an aspect of the Court itself such as recent voting trends, case load, an analysis of a particular Justice, or any other topic related to the Supreme Court.
Last year, our Supreme Court Preview included a diverse spectrum of works ranging from articles that examined cases argued in the Court’s October 2008 Term to articles that analyzed current voting trends among the Court. For example, in Crime Labs and Prison Guards: A Comment on Melendez-Diaz and Its Potential Impact on Capital Sentencing Proceedings, John Blume and Emily Paavola argued that the Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts could resolve conflicting authority on what constitutes testimonial hearsay under Crawford v. Washington and could have a dramatic impact on the criminal justice system, particularly capital sentencing proceedings. Alternatively, in The Roberts Court and Criminal Justice at the Dawn of the 2008 Term, Professors Christopher E. Smith, Michael A. McCall, and Madhavi M. McCall introduced empirical decision-making patterns from the initial three terms of the Roberts Court in an attempt to ascertain how the Court would likely determine three Fourth Amendment cases in the Court’s October 2008 Term.
The Supreme Court Preview is published to coincide with the opening of the October Term 2009, and we therefore ask that work be submitted no later than August 1, 2009. Submissions will be reviewed on a rolling basis beginning July 1, 2009. Please direct submissions and any questions about our Supreme Court Preview to Ben Garner, Editor in Chief, via email at bgarner [at] charlestonlaw.edu or via telephone at (434) 941-9831.
| April 3, 2009 | to | April 4, 2009 |
Maurer School of Law, Indiana University Bloomington, hosted the 2009 Critical Tax Conference April 3-4, 2009.
Maurer School of Law, Indiana University Bloomington, hosted the 2009 Critical Tax Conference April 3-4, 2009.
| April 7, 2009 |
Chris Gurhrie (Vanderbilt Law)
George Bermann (Columbia Law), U.S. Class Actions and the “Global Class”
Nina Mendelson (Michigan Law), Including ‘Political’ Reasons in Agency Decisionmaking
Eraldo Cacchione, The implications of a university’s Jesuit mission for a law school
Lia Epperson (Santa Clara Law)
Terry Turnipseed (Syracuse Law), Scalia’s Ship of Revulsion Has Sailed: Will Lawrence Protect Adults Who Adopt Lovers to Help Ensure Their Inheritance from Incest Prosecution?
Francille Wilson (USC American Studies and Ethnicity), ‘Negroes Were Stirred-Up Long Before There Was a Communist Party’: Re-examining Black Lawyers Support for Human Rights Through the Lens of Gender and Generation
Eric D. Weitz (Minnesota History), From the Vienna to the Paris System, or: What Human Rights has to do with Imperial Politics, Minority Protection, Forced Deportations, and German Genocides
Northwestern International Law
Jenia Iontcheva Turner (SMU Law)
Omar Dajani, (Pacific McGeorge)
Olivier Roy (U.C. Berkeley Poli. Sci.), Managing Religious Pluralism in Liberal States
Anup Malani (Boston Law) and Zvika Neeman (Boston Economics), Do Advertisements Affect the Physiological Efficacy of Branded Drugs?
Yale Workplace Theory and Policy
| April 24, 2009 |
The National University of Singapore (NUS) and the Asian Society of International Law (AsianSIL) invite submissions for the NUS Law School-AsianSIL Conference on Sovereign Wealth Funds: Governance and Regulation, to be held at the NUS Law School in Singapore on September 9-11, 2009.
All conference papers will be published as “working papers” on the AsianSIL website. A select number of accepted papers will subsequently be considered for formal publication in a special section of the Singapore Year Book of International Law. Paper-givers who are selected through a competitive process will have their reasonable expenses covered.
Completed proposals must be submitted Friday, 24 April 2009. Those selected to participate in the conference will be notified by Friday, 1 May 2009.
For possible topics, full details on the conference, and an explanation of submission requirements, please see the conference website.
The National University of Singapore (NUS) and the Asian Society of International Law (AsianSIL) invite submissions for the NUS Law School-AsianSIL Conference on Sovereign Wealth Funds: Governance and Regulation, to be held at the NUS Law School in Singapore on September 9-11, 2009.
All conference papers will be published as “working papers” on the AsianSIL website. A select number of accepted papers will subsequently be considered for formal publication in a special section of the Singapore Year Book of International Law. Paper-givers who are selected through a competitive process will have their reasonable expenses covered.
Completed proposals must be submitted Friday, 24 April 2009. Those selected to participate in the conference will be notified by Friday, 1 May 2009.
For possible topics, full details on the conference, and an explanation of submission requirements, please see the conference website.
| April 6, 2009 |
Eric D. Weitz (Minnesota History), From the Vienna to the Paris System, or: What Human Rights has to do with Imperial Politics, Minority Protection, Forced Deportations, and German Genocides
Northwestern International Law
Jenia Iontcheva Turner (SMU Law)
Omar Dajani, (Pacific McGeorge)
Olivier Roy (U.C. Berkeley Poli. Sci.), Managing Religious Pluralism in Liberal States
Anup Malani (Boston Law) and Zvika Neeman (Boston Economics), Do Advertisements Affect the Physiological Efficacy of Branded Drugs?
Yale Workplace Theory and Policy
Mark S. Weiner (Rutgers Law), Imagining the Rule of Law in Nineteenth-Century Britain
Paul Stephan (Virginia Law), Privatizing International Law
Harvard Legal History
Dalia Tsuk Mitchell (George Washington Law), Corporate Directors: Trustees, Representatives, Agents
Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff (Washington University Law)
Elizabeth Weeks Leonard (Kansas Law), Right to Health Care
Kristin Hickman (Minnesota Law)
Elizabeth Weeks Leonard (Kansas Law)
Washington University in St. Louis
Miranda Feischer (Illinois Law), Charitable Justice
| April 3, 2009 |
Mark S. Weiner (Rutgers Law), Imagining the Rule of Law in Nineteenth-Century Britain
Paul Stephan (Virginia Law), Privatizing International Law
Harvard Legal History
Dalia Tsuk Mitchell (George Washington Law), Corporate Directors: Trustees, Representatives, Agents
Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff (Washington University Law)
Elizabeth Weeks Leonard (Kansas Law), Right to Health Care
Kristin Hickman (Minnesota Law)
Elizabeth Weeks Leonard (Kansas Law)
Washington University in St. Louis
Miranda Feischer (Illinois Law), Charitable Justice
David L. Faigman (UC Hastings), Frames of Reference: Can Constitutionality Really Be Measured One Case at a Time?
Antoinette Schoar (MIT Managment), CEO Careers and Style
Lisa Bressman (Vanderbilt Law)
UC Irvine Center for Psychology and Law & Newkirk Center for Science and Society
Adam Kolber (San Diego Law), Emerging Neurotechnologies: Manipulating Experiences, Dampening Memories, and Customizing Punishment
| April 2, 2009 |
David L. Faigman (UC Hastings), Frames of Reference: Can Constitutionality Really Be Measured One Case at a Time?
Antoinette Schoar (MIT Managment), CEO Careers and Style
Lisa Bressman (Vanderbilt Law)
Wendy Gordon (Boston Law), Computer Technology, Moral Philosophy, and Copyright: The Grokster Case
Arti Rai (Duke Law), The Promise (and Limits) of Facially Neutral Patent Standards
R. Owen Williams (NYU Law), An Impartial Jury of the State”—A Flash of Nationalism in 1880
Sionaidh Douglas Scott (Oxford Law)
Jeff A. Redding (St. Louis Law), Dignity, Legal Pluralism, and Same-Sex Marriage
Scott Hershovitz (Michigan Law), Harry Potter and the Purpose of Tort Law
This blog features law-related Calls for Papers, Conferences, and Workshops as well as general legal scholarship resources. If you would like to have an event posted, please contact us at legalscholarshipblog|at|gmail.com.
This blog is managed by faculty and staff at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and the Gallagher Law Library of the University of Washington School of Law
:This blog seeks to facilitate the legal academy's development and dissemination of scholarship, and so does not feature events such as Continuing Legal Education programs or regional bar association meetings.