Int’l Antitrust Law & Policy – New York, NY
| September 23, 2010 | to | September 24, 2010 |
The presents the 37th Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy Sept. 23-24, 2010.
| September 23, 2010 | to | September 24, 2010 |
The presents the 37th Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy Sept. 23-24, 2010.
The Fordham Competition Law Institute presents the 37th Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy Sept. 23-24, 2010.
| September 20, 2010 | ||
| 8:00 pm |
Fordham Law and the American Bankruptcy Institute present the Seventh Annual Complex Financial Restructuring Program Sept. 20, 2010.
Fordham Law and the American Bankruptcy Institute present the Seventh Annual Complex Financial Restructuring Program Sept. 20, 2010.
| October 1, 2010 |
Marquette Law Review and the Marquette Labor and Employment Law Program present Promoting Employee Voice in the New American Economy Oct. 1, 2010. Details are on Milwaukee Employment Lawyer blog.
Marquette Law Review and the Marquette Labor and Employment Law Program present Promoting Employee Voice in the New American Economy Oct. 1, 2010. Details are on Milwaukee Employment Lawyer blog.
| October 15, 2010 |
The Raoul Dandurand Chair at the University of Quebec at Montreal and the Association for Borderlands Studies will hold Fences, Walls and Borders: State of Insecurity? May 19-20, 2011. The deadline for submitting abstracts is Oct. 15, 2010. Papers may be in French or English.
Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the question still remains “Do good fences still make good neighbours”? Since the Great Wall of China, construction of which began under the Qin dynasty, the Antonine Wall, built in Scotland to support Hadrian’s Wall, the Roman “Limes” or the Danevirk fence, the “wall” has been a constant in the protection of defined entities claiming sovereignty, East and West. But is the wall more than an historical relict for the management of borders? In recent years the wall has been given renewed vigour in North America, particularly along the U.S.-Mexico border, and in Israel, where the old Green line has been transformed into a wall separating Arab from Israeli. But the success of these new walls in the development of friendly and orderly relations between nations (or indeed, within nations) remains unclear. What role does the wall play in the development of security and insecurity? Do walls contribute to a sense of insecurity as much as they assuage fears and create a sense of security for those ‘behind the line’? Exactly what kind of security is associated with border walls?
| May 19, 2011 | to | May 20, 2011 |
The Raoul Dandurand Chair at the University of Quebec at Montreal and the Association for Borderlands Studies will hold Fences, Walls and Borders: State of Insecurity? May 19-20, 2011. The deadline for submitting abstracts is Oct. 15, 2010. Papers may be in French or English.
Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the question still remains “Do good fences still make good neighbours”? Since the Great Wall of China, construction of which began under the Qin dynasty, the Antonine Wall, built in Scotland to support Hadrian’s Wall, the Roman “Limes” or the Danevirk fence, the “wall” has been a constant in the protection of defined entities claiming sovereignty, East and West. But is the wall more than an historical relict for the management of borders? In recent years the wall has been given renewed vigour in North America, particularly along the U.S.-Mexico border, and in Israel, where the old Green line has been transformed into a wall separating Arab from Israeli. But the success of these new walls in the development of friendly and orderly relations between nations (or indeed, within nations) remains unclear. What role does the wall play in the development of security and insecurity? Do walls contribute to a sense of insecurity as much as they assuage fears and create a sense of security for those ‘behind the line’? Exactly what kind of security is associated with border walls?
The Raoul Dandurand Chair at the University of Quebec at Montreal and the Association for Borderlands Studies will hold Fences, Walls and Borders: State of Insecurity? May 19-20, 2011. The deadline for submitting abstracts is Oct. 15, 2010. Papers may be in French or English.
Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the question still remains “Do good fences still make good neighbours”? Since the Great Wall of China, construction of which began under the Qin dynasty, the Antonine Wall, built in Scotland to support Hadrian’s Wall, the Roman “Limes” or the Danevirk fence, the “wall” has been a constant in the protection of defined entities claiming sovereignty, East and West. But is the wall more than an historical relict for the management of borders? In recent years the wall has been given renewed vigour in North America, particularly along the U.S.-Mexico border, and in Israel, where the old Green line has been transformed into a wall separating Arab from Israeli. But the success of these new walls in the development of friendly and orderly relations between nations (or indeed, within nations) remains unclear. What role does the wall play in the development of security and insecurity? Do walls contribute to a sense of insecurity as much as they assuage fears and create a sense of security for those ‘behind the line’? Exactly what kind of security is associated with border walls?
| December 1, 2010 |
Valparaiso University School of Law will hold the 25th Annual Monsanto Lecture/Conference on Tort Law and Jurisprudence Feb. 18, 2011. The conference theme is Civil Litigation as a Tool for Regulating Climate Change. The call for papers deadline is Dec. 1, 2010. Jump to full post
| February 18, 2011 |
Valparaiso University School of Law will hold the 25th Annual Monsanto Lecture/Conference on Tort Law and Jurisprudence Feb. 18, 2011. The conference theme is Civil Litigation as a Tool for Regulating Climate Change. The call for papers deadline is Dec. 1, 2010. Jump to full post
Valparaiso University School of Law will hold the 25th Annual Monsanto Lecture/Conference on Tort Law and Jurisprudence Feb. 18, 2011. The conference theme is Civil Litigation as a Tool for Regulating Climate Change. The call for papers deadline is Dec. 1, 2010. Jump to full post
| October 29, 2010 |
Participants are being sought for a collaborative and comparative project in legal theory.
The Comparative Legal Theory project aims to place legal theory in its social, historical, and comparative context. Our goal is to produce jurisdictional reports on legal theory on the basis of a questionnaire prepared by the project organisers and through ongoing collaborative workshops.
A roundtable on the project will be held in Catania [Sicily] on Friday, 29 October 2010. Participants will be able to assist in creating the questionnaire to be used and to identify potential reporters.
The project managers are Seán Patrick Donlan (Limerick), Margaret Martin (Western Ontario), and Alessio Lo Giudice (Catania). Please email sean.donlan [at] ul.ie for additional information.
Please feel free to circulate this message to other individuals, institutions, blogs, etc.
Participants are being sought for a collaborative and comparative project in legal theory.
The Comparative Legal Theory project aims to place legal theory in its social, historical, and comparative context. Our goal is to produce jurisdictional reports on legal theory on the basis of a questionnaire prepared by the project organisers and through ongoing collaborative workshops.
A roundtable on the project will be held in Catania [Sicily] on Friday, 29 October 2010. Participants will be able to assist in creating the questionnaire to be used and to identify potential reporters.
The project managers are Seán Patrick Donlan (Limerick), Margaret Martin (Western Ontario), and Alessio Lo Giudice (Catania). Please email sean.donlan [at] ul.ie for additional information.
Please feel free to circulate this message to other individuals, institutions, blogs, etc.
Authors are being sought for a collection on Western legal hybridity. Anyone interested in participating should contact Seán Patrick Donlan (sean.donlan [at] ul.ie) or Dirk Heirbaut (dirk.heirbaut [at] ugent.be). Jump to full post
| September 17, 2010 |
Judge Thomas B. Griffith (U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia)
Jennifer B Wriggins (Maine Law) presents “Tort Law and Constitutional Law: Injury, Race, and Equal Protection.”
This paper is not publicly available.
Laura Beth Nielsen (Northwestern Sociology) and Stephen Engel (Minnesota Psychology) present “The Calculations, Costs and Consequences of Using the Courts for Social Change: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States.”
This paper is not publicly available.
Melissa Murray (UC Berkley Law) presents “Marriage as Punishment.”
This paper is not publicly available.
Judge Thomas B. Griffith (U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia)
Jennifer B Wriggins (Maine Law) presents “Tort Law and Constitutional Law: Injury, Race, and Equal Protection.”
This paper is not publicly available.
Laura Beth Nielsen (Northwestern Sociology) and Stephen Engel (Minnesota Psychology) present “The Calculations, Costs and Consequences of Using the Courts for Social Change: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States.”
This paper is not publicly available.
Melissa Murray (UC Berkley Law) presents “Marriage as Punishment.”
This paper is not publicly available.
This blog features law-related Calls for Papers, Conferences, and Workshops as well as general legal scholarship resources. If you would like to have an event posted, please contact us at legalscholarshipblog|at|gmail.com.
This blog is managed by faculty and staff at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and the Gallagher Law Library of the University of Washington School of Law
:This blog seeks to facilitate the legal academy's development and dissemination of scholarship, and so does not feature events such as Continuing Legal Education programs or regional bar association meetings.