Lewis and Clark
Joanna Schwartz (UCLA Law) presents “What Police Learn From Lawsuits.”
This paper is publicly available.
NYU Law, Economics and Politics
Melissa Schwartzberg (Columbia Political Science) presents “The Arbitrariness of Supermajority Rules.”
This paper is not available through the Social Science Research Network, but can be obtained through NYU’s site here.
University of Texas
Bill Sage (Texas Law) presents “Naming U.S. Health Reform.”
This paper is not available through the Social Science Research Network, but can be obtained through Texas’s site here.
Toronto Law and Economics
Randy Picker (Chicago Law)
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on December 7th, 2010
| COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, EVENTS, LECTURES |
no comments
Lewis and Clark
Joanna Schwartz (UCLA Law) presents “What Police Learn From Lawsuits.”
This paper is publicly available.
NYU Law, Economics and Politics
Melissa Schwartzberg (Columbia Political Science) presents “The Arbitrariness of Supermajority Rules.”
This paper is not available through the Social Science Research Network, but can be obtained through NYU’s site here.
University of Texas
Bill Sage (Texas Law) presents “Naming U.S. Health Reform.”
This paper is not available through the Social Science Research Network, but can be obtained through Texas’s site here.
Toronto Law and Economics
Randy Picker (Chicago Law)
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on December 7th, 2010
| COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, LECTURES |
no comments
| February 19, 2011 |
| 9:00 am | to | 12:45 pm |
The Northern Kentucky Law Review Spring 2011 Symposium, Third Party Litigation Finance in the United States, will take place February 19, 2011, 9 a.m. – 12:45 p.m.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on December 7th, 2010
| EVENTS |
no comments
Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law presents Adolescent Brains and Juvenile Justice: New Insights from Neuroscience, Genetics and Addiction Science May 12, 2011. It is sponsored by ASU’s Center for Law, Science & Innovation and Diane Halle Center for Family Justice and by the Law & Neuroscience Project.
New scientific findings regarding the adolescent brain from the fields of neuroscience, genetics and addiction science have the potential to transform the juvenile justice system by providing new evidence relevant to the culpability, deterrence, and rehabilitation potential of juvenile offenders. This evidence, which was cited by the U.S. Supreme Court in its 2010 decision in Graham v. Florida, has profound legal, policy and ethical implications for decision-makers.This multidisciplinary conference, the fourth in a series of biennual programs on neuroscience and the law held at the Phoenix federal courthouse, will examine how this new scientific information is currently being used, and could be used in the future, to improve juvenile justice. It will provide a balanced spectrum of scientific, legal and ethical perspectives by leading experts from across the nation.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on December 7th, 2010
| EVENTS |
no comments
