The Fordham Law Review presents Against Settlement: Twenty-Five Years Later April 3, 2009.
In 1984, Owen Fiss provocatively argued that the ADR movement overvalued settlement, that adjudication serves a purpose greater than dispute resolution, and that “[c]ivil litigation is an instrument for using state power to bring a recalcitrant reality closer to our chosen ideals.” Against Settlement, 93 Yale L.J. 1073 (1984). What do we make of his arguments twenty-five years later? In the intervening years, the dispute resolution field has matured, public interest lawyering has changed, aggregate litigation has grown with comprehensive resolution as an expected endgame, and global perspectives on litigation have become more prominent, shedding new light on the arguments Fiss raised.
The Fordham Law Review has assembled a remarkable group – many of the nation’s leading voices in ADR, complex litigation, and public interest lawyering – for a one-day symposium to reconsider questions of settlement and adjudication in civil litigation.
The symposium is co-sponsored by the Fordham Conflict Resolution and ADR Program.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| EVENTS |
no comments
The Fordham Law Review presents Against Settlement: Twenty-Five Years Later April 3, 2009.
In 1984, Owen Fiss provocatively argued that the ADR movement overvalued settlement, that adjudication serves a purpose greater than dispute resolution, and that “[c]ivil litigation is an instrument for using state power to bring a recalcitrant reality closer to our chosen ideals.” Against Settlement, 93 Yale L.J. 1073 (1984). What do we make of his arguments twenty-five years later? In the intervening years, the dispute resolution field has matured, public interest lawyering has changed, aggregate litigation has grown with comprehensive resolution as an expected endgame, and global perspectives on litigation have become more prominent, shedding new light on the arguments Fiss raised.
The Fordham Law Review has assembled a remarkable group – many of the nation’s leading voices in ADR, complex litigation, and public interest lawyering – for a one-day symposium to reconsider questions of settlement and adjudication in civil litigation.
The symposium is co-sponsored by the Fordham Conflict Resolution and ADR Program.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| Alternative Dispute Resolution, Civil Procedure, CONFERENCES |
no comments
| April 17, 2009 | to | April 18, 2009 |
Fair Housing Law and Enforcement – A Basic Survey of the Law and Practice hosted by the John Marshall Law School will be held in Chicago, April 17th and 18th. This is a basic introduction to fair housing law: federal, state, and local. This course is designed especially for those who would like a review of the law.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| EVENTS |
no comments
Fair Housing Law and Enforcement – A Basic Survey of the Law and Practice hosted by the John Marshall Law School will be held in Chicago, April 17th and 18th. This is a basic introduction to fair housing law: federal, state, and local. This course is designed especially for those who would like a review of the law.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| CONFERENCES |
no comments
The Mexican Law Review, the new journal of the Institute for Legal Research of the National Autonomous University, is permanently open to submissions from students, professors and practitioners on issues of Latin American, Mexican and comparative law.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| CALLS FOR PAPERS, Comparative Law |
no comments
Georgetown Law Library and Georgetown Law host The Future of Today’s Legal Scholarship: A Symposium in Honor of Bob Oakley, July 25, 2009.
The time to debate the role of blogs in legal scholarship has passed. As we approach the end of the first decade of the 21st century, one of our oldest and most conservative disciplines has clearly embraced the era of electronic publishing. Blogging has indeed transformed legal scholarship. Now it’s time to move the dialogue forward.
The Future of Today’s Legal Scholarship is a symposium that brings together academic bloggers, law librarians, and experts in preservation to tackle the bigger, more imperative challenges that will influence legal scholarship and democratic access to legal information for generations to come.
We must determine how to prioritize, collect, archive, preserve, and ensure reliable long-term access to the burgeoning amount of legal scholarship being published through new, informal channels on the Web.
The Future of Today’s Legal Scholarship aims to accomplish this objective through non-conventional means. This symposium is an active, idea-based exchange inviting the participation and contribution of attendees alongside that of expert presenters and panelists.
This unique symposium will seek answers to the questions:
1. How can quality academic scholarship reliably be discovered?
2. How can future researchers be assured of perpetual access to the information currently available in blogs?
3. How can any researcher be confident that documents posted to blogs are genuine?
The symposium will include a working group break-out session to create a uniform standard for preservation of blogs, a document to be shared by bloggers and librarians alike.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| EVENTS |
no comments
Georgetown Law Library and Georgetown Law host The Future of Today’s Legal Scholarship: A Symposium in Honor of Bob Oakley, July 25, 2009.
The time to debate the role of blogs in legal scholarship has passed. As we approach the end of the first decade of the 21st century, one of our oldest and most conservative disciplines has clearly embraced the era of electronic publishing. Blogging has indeed transformed legal scholarship. Now it’s time to move the dialogue forward.
The Future of Today’s Legal Scholarship is a symposium that brings together academic bloggers, law librarians, and experts in preservation to tackle the bigger, more imperative challenges that will influence legal scholarship and democratic access to legal information for generations to come.
We must determine how to prioritize, collect, archive, preserve, and ensure reliable long-term access to the burgeoning amount of legal scholarship being published through new, informal channels on the Web.
The Future of Today’s Legal Scholarship aims to accomplish this objective through non-conventional means. This symposium is an active, idea-based exchange inviting the participation and contribution of attendees alongside that of expert presenters and panelists.
This unique symposium will seek answers to the questions:
1. How can quality academic scholarship reliably be discovered?
2. How can future researchers be assured of perpetual access to the information currently available in blogs?
3. How can any researcher be confident that documents posted to blogs are genuine?
The symposium will include a working group break-out session to create a uniform standard for preservation of blogs, a document to be shared by bloggers and librarians alike.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| CONFERENCES, Law and Technology, Law Librarianship, Legal Education |
no comments
The Chinese Journal of International Law (published by Oxford University Press) has just published an “Agora: Kosovo.” The Journal invites responses to these papers as well as further papers for consideration for publication in a subsequent issue. See the list of articles here.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| CALLS FOR PAPERS, International Law |
no comments
The University of Manchester School of Law project on the Impact of the Criminal Process on Health Care Ethics and Practice will host Good, Bad or Indifferent: Medicine and the Criminal Process on Nov. 3-4, 2009.
Day 1 will focus on the prosecution of doctors; in the afternoon there will be workshops on Tainted Blood; The Role of the Criminal Process, The Role of the Coroner, Assisted Dying, Tourism and Covert Acceptance; and lastly a workshop on the Selling of Body Parts. Day 2 will focus on Ethical Conflicts in Criminal Courts.
The deadline for submissions is April 17, 2009.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| EVENTS |
no comments
| November 3, 2009 | to | November 4, 2009 |
The University of Manchester School of Law project on the Impact of the Criminal Process on Health Care Ethics and Practice will host Good, Bad or Indifferent: Medicine and the Criminal Process on Nov. 3-4, 2009.
Day 1 will focus on the prosecution of doctors; in the afternoon there will be workshops on Tainted Blood; The Role of the Criminal Process, The Role of the Coroner, Assisted Dying, Tourism and Covert Acceptance; and lastly a workshop on the Selling of Body Parts. Day 2 will focus on Ethical Conflicts in Criminal Courts.
The deadline for submissions is April 17, 2009.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| EVENTS |
no comments
The University of Manchester School of Law project on the Impact of the Criminal Process on Health Care Ethics and Practice will host Good, Bad or Indifferent: Medicine and the Criminal Process on Nov. 3-4, 2009.
Day 1 will focus on the prosecution of doctors; in the afternoon there will be workshops on Tainted Blood; The Role of the Criminal Process, The Role of the Coroner, Assisted Dying, Tourism and Covert Acceptance; and lastly a workshop on the Selling of Body Parts. Day 2 will focus on Ethical Conflicts in Criminal Courts.
The deadline for submissions is April 17, 2009.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| CALLS FOR PAPERS, CONFERENCES, Criminal Law, Health Law |
no comments
Iowa
Anthony Alfieri (Miami Law)
Kansas
Pauline Kim (Washington Law), Deliberation and Strategy on the United States Courts of Appeals: An Empirical Exploration of Panel Effects
Loyola Los Angeles
Brian Galle (Florida State), Tax Incentives and the Judicial Role in Interstate Trade
Missouri
Robert Miller (Villanova Law)
Temple
George Triantis (Houston Law Center)
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on March 6th, 2009
| COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Tax Law |
no comments
