University of Pittsburgh School of Law is hosting today Sociolegal Methods in International Law, a workshop to explore the role of sociolegal methodologies in describing and defining the contours of international law. The list of workshop participants is here. For more information, contact Professor Elena Baylis.
Jump to full post
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on September 5th, 2008
| Law and Humanities, International Law, CONFERENCES |
no comments
We seek papers on food, culture, and the law, written from a variety of perspectives, appropriate for presentation at one or both of the following conferences: the Association for the Study of Law, Culture, and the Humanities (Suffolk University Law School, Boston, April 3-4, 2009) and the Association for the Study of Food and Society (details for the 2009 conference TBA on the ASFS website). Although we aim to use these panels as a partial foundation for creating the edited collection, we are also happy to consider abstracts and articles from potential contributors who are unable to attend either ASLCH or ASFS. Finished essays should be of a quality suitable for publication with an established university press and reasonably accessible to a multidisciplinary audience of scholars and students of the law, social sciences, and humanities, as well as interested readers outside the academy.
J. Amy Dillard
Assistant Professor of Law
University of Baltimore School of Law
1420 North Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
adillard[at]ubalt.edu Jump to full post
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on August 15th, 2008
| Law and Society, Comparative Law, Law and Humanities, CALLS FOR PAPERS, International Law, Intellectual Property, Health Law, Environmental Law, CONFERENCES |
no comments
The Institute of Linguistics at Adam Mickiewicz University presents the Fourth Conference on Translation, Interpreting and Comparative Legi-Linguistics, an international conference on language and the law. “Our aim is to provide a forum for discussion in those scientific fields where linguistic and legal interests converge, and to facilitate integration between linguists, computer scientists and lawyers from all around the world.” The conference takes place July 2-4, 2009, in Poznan, Poland.
The organizers invite papers on a wide range of topics related to forensic linguistics in general; legal translation and court interpreting; legal languages and legal discourse; computational linguistics; history of law and legal systems; and laws on languages. Abstracts should be submitted by Feb. 28, 2009.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on June 11th, 2008
| Law and Humanities, Legal Research & Writing, Legal History, CALLS FOR PAPERS, CONFERENCES |
no comments
Boston University
Jim Fleming (Boston University Law), Traditionalism and Backlash in Constitutional Argument
Chicago Family, Sex, and Gender
Laura Rosenbury (Washington University in St. Louis Law), Beyond Intimacy
Columbia
Claire Priest (Columbia Law), Understanding the End of Entail: Information, Institutions, and Slavery in the American Revolutionary Period
Connecticut
Madhavi Sunder (UC Davis), The New Enlightenment: How Muslim Women are Bringing Religion Out of the Dark Ages
Georgetown
Eric Feldman (Penn Law)
Harvard
Sharon Dolovich (UCLA Law), Defining Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference
Minnesota Faculty Works
Heidi Kitrosser (Minnesota Law), The Reality Based Constitution
NYU Tax Policy & Public Finance
Jason Furman (The Brookings Institution), Reforming the Tax Treatment of Health Care: Right Ways and Wrong Ways
San Diego
Cynthia Estlund (NYU Law)
SMU
Rose Villazor (SMU Law), Birthright Citizenship in the U.S. Territories
Temple International Law
Rachel Brewster (Harvard Law), Renegotiation and Reinterpretation of Treaties
Yale Human Rights
Ruti Teitel (New York Law School), Humanity’s Law
Yale Law & Economics
Sendhil Mullainathan (Harvard Economics), Taking the Long Way Around: Real Consequences of Transport Corruption
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on April 24th, 2008
| Law and Religion, Law and Race, Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Law and Economics, Legal History, Health Law, Family Law, Tax Law, Constitutional Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Alabama
Jim Krier (Michigan Law)
Chicago Law & Philosophy
John Hagan (Northwestern Sociology)
Columbia Law & Economics
Efraim Benmelech (Harvard Economics), Vintage Capital and Creditor Protection
Georgetown Law & Philosophy
Leif Wenar (Sheffield Philosophy), The Analysis of Rights
Georgetown Statutory Colloquium
Theodore Ruger (Penn Law), Gonzales v. Oregon and the Normative Constitution of American Health Care
Georgia
David Arthur Skeel (Penn Law)
Harvard
Kathy Zeiler (Georgetown Law), The Endowment Effect: Implications of Recent Empirical Developments for Legal Theory & Exchange Asymmetries Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Endowment Effect Theory and Prospect Theory
Harvard International Law
Paul Slovic (Oregon Psychology)
Michigan International Law
Eleanor Sharpston (Advocate General, European Court of Justice), ‘Freedom, Security, and Justice’ in the European Union: The Story so Far and (some of) the Challenges for the Future
Penn Law & Philosophy
Jody Kraus (Virginia Law), The Correspondence and Divergence in Contract and Promise
Rutgers-Camden
Frank Pasquale (Seton Hall Law), Taxing Tiering: Addressing Inequality in Health Care as Cross-Subsidization Declines
Seton Hall
Stephanie Ben-Ishai (York Law)
St. John’s
Rosemary C. Salomone (St. John’s Law), Official English: The Reality and the Rhetoric
Stetson
Jerry L. Anderson (Drake Law), An Empirical Study of Attitudes Toward Zoning
Texas
Albert Choi (Virginia Law)
Michael Conroy (Colibri Consulting), How Civil Society is Striking Back at Neoliberal Globalization: Tales from the ‘Certification Revolution’
UC Berkeley
Richard Perry (San Jose State University), On the Strange Career of the Cultural Defense
UC Berkeley Law & Economics
Matthew Stephenson (Harvard Law) & Jide Nzelibe (Northwestern Law), Political Accountability Under Alternative Institutional Regimes
UCLA Faculty Mondays
Fiona Harrison (California Institute of Technology), Three Big Questions about the Universe (and how Astrophysicists are trying to answer them)
Yale Corporate Law
William H. McDavid (Ret. General Counsel, J.P. Morgan Chase), Enron: The Aftermath
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on April 7th, 2008
| Labor and Employment Law, Law and Economics, Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Courts, Legal History, Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Property Law, International Law, Commercial Law, Administrative Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Cincinnati
Natasha Martin (Seattle Law), Immunity for Hire: The Same Actor Factor as a Subterfuge to Equality in the Contemporary Workplace
Duke
Christine Jolls (Yale Law)
Florida
Craig Anthony Arnold (Louisville Law), Land Use Regulation and the Democratic Process
Georgetown International Human Rights
Martin Flaherty (Fordham Law), Executive Authority, Fundamental Rights, and Global Separation of Powers
Georgia International Law
David Caron (UC Berkeley Law), Why International Courts and Tribunals Look and Act as They Do
Harvard International Law
John Mikhail (Georgetown Law)
Iowa
Thomas Merrill (Columbia Law), The Rule of First Possession and the Rule of Accession
Missouri
Heidi Kitrosser (Minnesota Law)
Syracuse
Eric A. Kades (William & Mary Law), A Positive Theory of Eminent Domain
Texas
Kristin Collins (BU Law), Let the Government become their Guardians: Administrative Law, Social Provision, and the Legal Construction of the Family in the Early Nineteenth Century
UCLA Faculty Friday
Mark Tushnet (Harvard Law), The Rights Revolution in the Twentieth Century
Virginia
Gia Lee (UCLA Law), Free Speech Deference
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on April 4th, 2008
| Labor and Employment Law, Law and Economics, Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Courts, Legal History, Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Property Law, International Law, Commercial Law, Administrative Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Akron
Jane Larson (Wisconsin Law), Regulating Sex: Multiple Paradigms for Thinking About Sexual Freedom and Autonomy
Chicago-Kent
Jeffrey G. Sherman (Chicago-Kent Law)
CUNY
Wendy Bach (CUNY Law)
Emory
Anne Dailey (UConn Law), Imagination and Choice
NYU Legal History
Bernard Freamon (Seton Hall Law), The Abolition of the Indian Ocean Slave Trade and the Vicissitudes of Empire
SMU Law & Citizenship
Michael Kirsch (Notre Dame Law), Taxing Citizens in a Global Economy
Texas
Alejandro Moreno (Texas Medicine), Implementation of the Istanbul Protocol - A Summary Report of the Efforts to Eliminate Torture and Ill-Treatment in Mexico
Toronto Law & Economics
Edward Rock (Penn Law), The Hanging Chads of Corporate Voting
UC Hastings
Reza Dibadj (USF Law)
UCLA Williams Institute
Adam Romero (The Williams Institute), When Family Falls
USC Law, History & Culture
Josephine McDonagh (King’s College), On Settling and Being Unsettled: Motion and Emotion in Dickens’s Bleak House
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on April 2nd, 2008
| Comparative Law, Law and Gender, Law and Sexuality, Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Law and Literature, Law and Economics, Business Law, Family Law, Tax Law, Legal History, Uncategorized |
no comments
The Sixth International Conference on the Humanities (a/k/a Sixth International Conference on New Directions in the Humanities) will be held in Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey, July 15-18, 2008.
The conference will address a range of critically important themes in the various fields that make up the humanities today.
* * *
Anthropology, Archaeology, Classics, Communication, English, Fine Arts, Geography, Government, History, Journalism, Languages, Linguistics, Literature, Media Studies, Philosophy, Politics, Sociology or Religion-these are just some of the many disciplines represented at the Humanities Conference. The focus of papers ranges from the finely grained and empirical to the expansive and theoretical.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on March 20th, 2008
| Law and Humanities, CALLS FOR PAPERS, CONFERENCES |
no comments
Georgetown International Human Rights
Paolo Carozza (Notre Dame Law), The ‘Art’ of Democracy and the ‘Taste For Local Freedom’: International Human Rights and the American Constitutional Difference
Notre Dame
Barbara Stark (Hofstra Law), International Law
San Diego
Cary Coglianese (Penn Law)
UCLA Faculty Fridays
Eric Biber (UC Berkeley Law), Too Many Things to Do: How to Deal with the Dysfunctions of Multiple-Goal Agencies
Virginia
Tonja Jacobi (Northwestern Law), Supermedians
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on March 13th, 2008
| Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Administrative Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Boston University
Laura Beny (Michigan Law), Private Regulation of Insider Trading in the Shadow of Lax Public Enforcement (and a Strong Neighbor)–Evidence from Canadian Firms
Chicago Constitutional Law
George Fisher (Stanford Law), Married to Alcohol: The Drug War’s Moral Roots
Chicago Family, Sex, and Gender
Jane Dailey (Chicago History), White Supremacy Is in Peril: Race, Marriage and Sovereignty in the New World Order
Columbia
Alex Raskolnikov (Columbia Law), Beyond Deterrence: Targeting Tax Enforcement with a Penalty Default
Fordham
Linda Sugin (Fordham Law)
Harvard
Ayelet Shachar (Toronto Law), The Global Race for Talent
Iowa
Chancellor Chandler (Delware Court of Chancery)
Loyola-L.A.
Brian Galle (Florida State Law), Tax Fairness
Michigan Law & Economics
Robert Daines (Stanford Law), Rating the Ratings: How Good are the Commercial Governance Ratings?
Minnesota Faculty Works
Alexandra B. Klass (Minnesota Law) & Elizabeth Wilson (Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs), Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration: A Consideration of Tort and Property Law
Northwestern Tax
Michael Knoll (Penn Law), The Tax Advantage of ‘Sweat Equity’: What it is and its Relationship to the Carried Interest Controversy
NYU Tax Policy and Public Finance
Mihir Desai (Harvard Business), Foreign-Direct Investment and Domestic Economic Activity
St. Thomas (MN)
Ed Adams (Minnesota Law)
Temple International Law
Robert Ahdieh (Emory Law), Standardization 2.0: A New Version of the Game
Texas
Peter Smith (George Washington Law), Originalism’s Living Constitutionalism
Toronto Health Law
Chidi Oguamanam (Dalhousie Law), The Future of Personalized Medicine and Personalizing the Medicine of the Future: In Search of Insights from Complementary and Alternative Medicine
UCLA Legal Theory
Jessica Litman (Michigan Law), Rethinking Copyright
Yale Human Rights
Shareen Hertel (UConn Political Science), Rights in Conflict: Insights from Transnational Labor and Economic Rights
Yale Law & Economics
Michael Woodford (Columbia Economics), Principles and Public Policy Decisions: The Case of Monetary Policy
Yale Workplace Theory & Policy
Jacob Hacker (Yale Political Science), The Politics of Risk Privatization in U.S. Social Policy
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on March 5th, 2008
| Law and Race, Law and Economics, Tort Law, Comparative Law, Law and Humanities, Law and Technology, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, International Law, Environmental Law, Health Law, Intellectual Property, Property Law, Business Law, Family Law, Constitutional Law, Tax Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Chicago Law & Philosophy
Janice Nadler (Northwestern Law)
Duke International & Comparative Law
Jurgen Basedow (Max Planck Institute), The Reform of European Antitrust Law
Georgetown Law & Philosophy
John Mikhail (Georgetown Law), Bentham’s Theory of Fictions and Critique of Natural Rights
Georgia
Douglas H. Yarn (Georgia State Law)
Penn Law & Philosophy
John Gardner (Oxford Law), Introduction to the Second Edition of H.L.A. Hart’s Punishment and Responsibility
Rutgers-Camden
Damon Smith (Rutgers-Camden Law), Reconceptualizing Urban Redevelopment: Participatory Planning and Procedural Protections
San Diego
Ken Bamberger (UC Berkeley Law)
Seton Hall
Janai Nelson (St. John’s Law)
Stanford Internet & Society
Judith Donath (MIT), Virtual Design and Trustworthy Signals
St. John’s
Sherry F. Colb (Columbia Law), Why is Torture “Different” and How “Different” is it?
Temple
Steven L. Schwarcz (Duke Law), Protecting Financial Markets: Lessons from the Subprime Mortgage Meltdown
UC Berkeley
Cindy Skach (Harvard Government), The Constitution of Peoples: Outlaw Religion and the Public Sphere
UC Berkeley Law & Economics
Robert Litan (Kauffman Foundation), Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, and the Economics of Growth and Prosperity
Yale Corporate Law
Michael R. Eisenson (Charlesbank Capital Partners), An Insider’s Perspective on Private Equity Investing
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on February 10th, 2008
| Law and Religion, Law and Economics, Comparative Law, Law and Humanities, Law and Philosophy, Antitrust Law, Civil Rights Law, CONFERENCES, Property Law, Intellectual Property, Business Law, Commercial Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Chicago Law & Philosophy
James Lindgren (Northwestern Law)
Chicago-Kent Civil Liberties
David D. Cole (Georgetown Law) & Jules L. Lobel (Pittsburgh Law), Less Safe, Less Free: Why America is Losing the War on Terror
Columbia Legal Theory
Eric Posner (Chicago Law), The Recurrent Illusion: International Relations and Global Legalism
Emory
Anu Bradford (Harvard Law), International Antitrust Negotiations and the False Hope of the WTO
Georgetown Law & Philosophy
Michael Perry (Emory Law), Morality and Normativity & Liberal Democracy and Human Rights
Georgia State
David Anderson
Northwestern Law & Economics
Edward B. Rock (Penn Law), The Hanging Chads of Corporate Voting
Marquette
Alan Madry (Marquette Law), Land Use Regulation and the New Property Revisited
Rutgers-Camden
Benjamin Zipursky (Fordham Law), Two Dimensions of Responsibility
Southwestern
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (Rutgers Law), The Right to Self Defense
Stanford Internet & Society
Mark Cooper (Consumer Federation of America), The Digital Revolution, Defining the Consumer Victory and Defending the Public Interest in the 21st Century: Network Neutrality, Digital Downloading, and Privacy in Online Advertising
St. John’s
Ronald J. Colombo (Hofstra Law), Ownership, Limited: Reconciling Tradition and Progressive Corporate Law via an Aristotelian Understanding of Ownership
Temple
Richard Greenstein (Temple Law)
Texas
Niko Matouschek (Northwestern Management)
James K. Galbraith (Texas Public Affairs), How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too
Toledo
Ron Shapiro (Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler), Dare to Prepare: How to Win Before You Begin
UC Berkeley
Tom Ginsburg (Illinois Law), The Lifespan of Written Constitutions
UC Hastings
Cesare Romano (Loyola LA Law), The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who Decide the World’s Cases
Yale Corporate Law
David Machlowitz (Medco Health Solutions, Inc.), Standing In Front Of The Bulls Eye: The Corporate Counsel In A Corporate Crisis
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on January 28th, 2008
| Law and Humanities, National Security Law, Law and Economics, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Law and Technology, Law and Philosophy, Law and Cyberspace, Tort Law, Commercial Law, Intellectual Property, Property Law, Criminal Law, Business Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Spoils of War v. Cultural Heritage: The Russian Cultural Property Law in Historical Context is sponsored by Harvard Law School Arts & Literature Law Society;
Commission for Art Recovery; Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University; Foundation for International Cultural Diplomacy; Harvard Law School European Law Research Center, Feb. 8-9, 2008, at Harvard.
After WWII, Soviet authorities, seeking reparations for the extensive costs of Nazi aggression, used special “Trophy Brigades” to empty museums, castles, and salt mines in Germany and Eastern Europe, transporting millions of cultural treasures to the USSR. These included German state-owned cultural objects, cultural objects taken from churches and synagogues, as well as a great deal of private property that had been looted by the Germans from individuals. The art works taken back to the Soviet Union were held in relative secrecy for years, until the final years of glastnost (Гла́сность). As European countries started to demand their cultural treasures and archives, Russian legislators passed a law that potentially nationalizes all cultural treasures brought to Russia at the end of World War II. In 1999 the Constitutional Court issued an opinion basically upholding the law. How do these actions comport with international law? What are the chances for restitution of these displaced cultural valuables?
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on January 19th, 2008
| Law and Humanities, International Law, CONFERENCES, Property Law |
no comments
Boston College Legal History
Karen Beck (Curator of Rare Books, Boston College Law), The Nineteenth-Century American Lawyer’s Private Library: A Look at the Evidence
Boston University
Ken Simons (Boston University Law)
Columbia
John Leubsdorf (Columbia Law), Legal Ethics Falls Apart
Columbia Tax Policy
Michael Graetz (Yale Law), 100 Million Unnecessary Returns: A Simple, Fair, and Competitive Tax Plan for the United States
Fordham
Lani Guinier (Harvard Law), All of Us is Tired: Notes Toward a Demosprudence of Social Movements
NYU Legal, Political, and Social Philosophy
David Golove (NYU Law), Incorporating Global Justice into the U.S. Constitution
Penn Law and Philosophy
David Enoch (Columbia Law), Intending, Foreseeing, and the State
USC China Institute
William Alford (Harvard Law), “Second Lawyers, First Principles”: Lawyers, Rice-Roots Legal Workers, and the Battle Over Legal Professionalism in China
Yale Law, Economics, and Organization
Abraham Wickelgren (Northwestern Law), Credible Discovery, Settlement, and Negative Expected Value Suits
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on December 6th, 2007
| Legal Ethics, Law and Society, Comparative Law, Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Law and Economics, Legal History, Tax Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, Tort Law, Criminal Law |
no comments
Columbia Law and Economics
Luigi Zingales (Chicago Business), Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?
Loyola Tax Policy
Neil Buchanan (George Washington Law), What Do We Owe Future Generations: Framing the Issues, with an Application to Budget Policy
Michigan International Law
John B. Bellinger (U.S. Dep’t of State), The United States and International law: Three Current Controversies
Seton Hall
Vince Blasi (Columbia Law), Madison and the Sedition Act of 1798
Temple
Alice Abreu (Temple Law), Contracting the Definition of Income: The Role of Administrability as an Independent Tax Policy Value
Texas Human Rights
Patrick Macklem (Toronto Law), What is International Human Rights Law? Three Applications of a Distributive Account
Toledo
Danny Bogden (McDonald Carano Wilson), Starting Over: An Insider View of the Attorney General Firings
UCLA Faculty Mondays
Saul Friedlander (UCLA History), Towards an Integrated History of the Holocaust
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on November 19th, 2007
| Law and Economics, Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Legal History, International Law, Business Law, Tax Law, Uncategorized |
no comments
Chicago-Kent
Randall W. Roth (Hawaii Law), The Lawyer as Whistleblower: Lessons from the Bishop Estate Controversy
Chicago-Kent Legal History
Nathan Oman (William & Mary Law), Preaching in the Courthouse and Judging in the Temple
Connecticut
Bethany Berger (UConn Law), Red: Uses of American Indian Race
Duke International and Comparative Law
Jean-Marie Henckaerts (Legal Advisor to the International Red Cross), The IRC Report on International Humanitarian Law and Its Critics
Emory
Jonathan Klick (Florida State Law), Cheap Donuts and Expensive Broccoli: The Effect of Relative Prices on Obesity
NYU Legal History
Sophia Lee (NYU Law, Samuel I. Golieb Fellow), “Race, Sex and Rulemaking, 1964-1977: Revising Equal Protection History, Recovering Administrative Constitutionalism” and “Almost Revolutionary: Administrative Constitutionalism, Labor Politics, and Workplace Civil Rights, 1935-1978″
Oregon Environmental and Natural Resources Law
Steven Kevan (Oregon Physics) and Greg Bothun (Oregon Physics), Physicists on Renewable Energy
Vanderbilt
Robert Ahdieh (Emory Law)
Washington
Steve Calandrillo (Washington Law), Time Well Spent: An Economic Analysis of Daylight Saving Time Legislation
Posted by pittlegalscholarship on November 7th, 2007
| Law and Religion, Legal Ethics, Law and Humanities, COLLOQUIA/ WORKSHOPS, Law and Science, Labor and Employment Law, Law and Economics, Environmental Law, Tax Law, International Law, Indian Law, Legal History, Uncategorized |
no comments
Forgiveness: Probing the Boundaries is an inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary conference, research and publishing project” that “aims to explore the nature, significance, and practices of forgiveness.” The conference will take place March 7-9, 2008, in Salzburg, Austria. The deadline for abstracts was Nov. 2, 2007.
Posted by uwlegalscholarship on November 6th, 2007
| Law and Humanities, Law and Psychology, Jurisprudence |
no comments
Boston University
Amanda Frost (American Law), (Over)Valuing Uniformity
Brooklyn
Christopher Eisgruber (Princeton Law and Public Affairs), The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process
Columbia
Lani Guinier (Harvard Law), Beyond Electocracy: Rethinking The Political Representative as a Powerful Stranger
Columbia Tax Policy
Lily Batchelder (NYU Law), How Should an Ideal Consumption Tax or Income Tax Treat Wealth Transfers
Duke International and Comparative Law
Erhard Busek (Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe), Southeast Europe–A Region Regains Stability and Future: Changes and Open Problems (Kosovo, Bosnia, EU Enlargement)
Georgetown
Marty Lederman (Georgetown Law), The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb
Minnesota Public Law
Gillian Metzger (Columbia Law), Administrative Law as the New Federalism
NYU Legal, Political and Social Philosophy
Ronald Dworkin (NYU Law), Responsibility Without Freedom
Stanford Law and Economics
Michael Meurer (